Jeff Passan takes a run at Nolan Ryan.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/mlb--despite-being-a-texas-legend--it-s-nolan-ryan-who-is-at-fault-in-rangers-front-office-flap-194617711.html
Whatever on that. I was intrigued by the choice of words at the top of the column. Emphasis mine:
<i>"In the 11 days since someone in Ryan's camp leaked to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram his dissatisfaction with the Rangers' new power structure that took away his title of team president, all Ryan has mustered publicly is a statement that said absolutely nothing, a hubristic response unbecoming a CEO whose organization is in crisis mode."</i>
Will Passan use some version of the word "leak" to describe sources who talk to him from hereon? Or is "leak" a word he simply uses to describe sources against the ones he relies on?
I like the guy's work a lot. Just curious why the Star-Telegram's scoop is shaded as treachery.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/mlb--despite-being-a-texas-legend--it-s-nolan-ryan-who-is-at-fault-in-rangers-front-office-flap-194617711.html
Whatever on that. I was intrigued by the choice of words at the top of the column. Emphasis mine:
<i>"In the 11 days since someone in Ryan's camp leaked to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram his dissatisfaction with the Rangers' new power structure that took away his title of team president, all Ryan has mustered publicly is a statement that said absolutely nothing, a hubristic response unbecoming a CEO whose organization is in crisis mode."</i>
Will Passan use some version of the word "leak" to describe sources who talk to him from hereon? Or is "leak" a word he simply uses to describe sources against the ones he relies on?
I like the guy's work a lot. Just curious why the Star-Telegram's scoop is shaded as treachery.