Mizzougrad96 said:Floyd is a whiny pantload. He has been since he was at Iowa State.
albert77 said:Mizzougrad96 said:Floyd is a whiny pantload. He has been since he was at Iowa State.
Maybe so, but Enfield's taken some pretty harsh and unnecessary personal potshots at Floyd.
Gold said:How does USC benefit if the player ends up at UCLA.
Stoney said:Gold said:How does USC benefit if the player ends up at UCLA.
Enfield didn't know he'd resurface at UCLA when the alleged tampering happened.
My understanding of the Hamilton recruiting saga goes something like this: Originally signed a LOI to play for Floyd at UTEP. Enfield and staff then allegedly tampered by encouraging the kid to ditch Floyd and switch to USC. Kid notifies Floyd he wants to decommit. Floyd, angered by the alleged tampering, refuses to release him from his LOI. Meanwhile, as the bickering goes on between UTEP and USC, the kid ditches both schools and ends up at UCLA, where I believe he's sitting out this season because he never got the release.
If Enfied is guilty of tampering with Hamilton, it certainly backfired on him, as he's now at USC's crosstown rival instead of out in El Paso where he can't hurt him.
Elliotte Friedman said:Enfield sounds like he could use some humility...but how much do you want to bet Floyd's continued to recruit guys who've committed somewhere else?
Do any of these guys have great morals?
Elliotte Friedman said:Enfield sounds like he could use some humility...but how much do you want to bet Floyd's continued to recruit guys who've committed somewhere else?
Do any of these guys have great morals?
Jake_Taylor said:Elliotte Friedman said:Enfield sounds like he could use some humility...but how much do you want to bet Floyd's continued to recruit guys who've committed somewhere else?
Do any of these guys have great morals?
College basketball is a little like The Wire or the wild west. These murders, hustlers and thieves generally have a moral code, it just doesn't necessarily conform to the law, in this case the NCAA rulebook. Scott Drew is despised by other coaches and looked at as a cheater even though the stuff that pisses them off isn't necessarily "illegal." I bet most coaches would rather lose a recruit because the other program offered (more) cash than have one poached after signing.
It seems like Enfield has done a few things that aren't acceptable in the world of college basketball coaches. Maybe it's partially because he didn't spend the years as an assistant learning the way that world works.
printit said:Jake_Taylor said:Elliotte Friedman said:Enfield sounds like he could use some humility...but how much do you want to bet Floyd's continued to recruit guys who've committed somewhere else?
Do any of these guys have great morals?
College basketball is a little like The Wire or the wild west. These murders, hustlers and thieves generally have a moral code, it just doesn't necessarily conform to the law, in this case the NCAA rulebook. Scott Drew is despised by other coaches and looked at as a cheater even though the stuff that pisses them off isn't necessarily "illegal." I bet most coaches would rather lose a recruit because the other program offered (more) cash than have one poached after signing.
It seems like Enfield has done a few things that aren't acceptable in the world of college basketball coaches. Maybe it's partially because he didn't spend the years as an assistant learning the way that world works.
This is it exactly. They all expect the cheating and they all engage it, to some form or fashion. It's the guys who cross certain other lines, some of them based on unwritten rules, that are universally despised.
Jake_Taylor said:It seems like Enfield has done a few things that aren't acceptable in the world of college basketball coaches. Maybe it's partially because he didn't spend the years as an assistant learning the way that world works.