This guy sickens me

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

I'd like to say that maybe people just didn't know any better. I mean, who really pays that much attention to an attorney general's primary?

But on the other hand, it's a damn primary. Who's voting in a primary besides the people who really do give a ****?

Maybe they just heard the guy's name, paid no attention to what was actually said and went with it. But I find that highly, highly unlikely. In fact, I think pope might be closer to reality. No way can I say a majority of those votes came from Republicans, but I'm betting a few did.
 
Junker was born in Germany and lived in Romania when Hitler was gaining power. Junker's father, a farmer, spoke highly of Hitler and that left an impression on Junker. He volunteered to join the German Waffen SS, in 1940 and he served in Russia, where he said he and his countrymen worked to free Russians from communism.

I liked this part of the story. So they weren't trying to conquer all of Europe, they were freeing the Russian people from Communism? What a bunch of sweethearts.

Holocaust deniers like this guy just don't want to acknowledge what they were part of. Others just hate Jews or have an agenda.
 
This guy is a ****. That's a given. So he's got a shrine to a dead man. So what. **** him.
 
zeke12 said:
armageddon said:
PTOWN said:
Milwaukee has a huge Polish community, and I would think the backlash on this story will be catastrophic. It's not really even that interesting. Who cares about some back woods jag bag with an homage to Hitler?? The guys got to be out of his mind or just plain stupid to let the MJS talk to him.

Huge Polish community? You either haven't been to Milwaukee recently or are basing your assertion on reports from the '70s and '80s.

Seriously.

And for the record, no one would go so far as to call Elkhorn even a suburb of Milwaukee.

But I have a question regarding a larger issue.

How can anyone say this guy's views should be ignored, scoffed at or quashed just because we don't like his message? I think the guy is a loon, a dangerous loon.

But since when do we get to pick and choose whose views are worthy of being heard?

There is no way the paper can ignore this guy. From a jouralistic point of view it is an interesting story. Hell, I find it fascinating a guy like this believes what he does. Disturbing, but nonetheless fascinating.

I don't share his beliefs. I have no doubt the Holocaust is fact, not myth. But if we start silencing people just because we don't like their message...

Do we really want to travel that road?

Uhhh, because all views aren't created equal, and those with no basis in fact have no business being in a newspaper.

I can call the paper and tell them I've been called up to pitch for the Red Sox tonight. I might even well believe it.
Doesn't mean they should print it.

Bad analogy. Now if you create an homage to your time in the majors, we might be in the same ballpark.

The man ****ing paid $200,000 to create an homage to Hitler. That is a story. People tend to notice extravagant homages to anti-Semitic dictators and wonder what is going on. The community reaction is a story.
 
I do notice the story was very careful to give pretty specific description of where the shrine is located.


Good, good, good.


Dynamite.jpg_thumbnail1.jpgEC27CFDA-6D8D-4F4D-8D9CE09BB1F1CD4B.jpgLarge.jpg



;) ;D ;)
 
Starman said:
I do notice the story was very careful to give pretty specific description of where the shrine is located.


Good, good, good.


Dynamite.jpg_thumbnail1.jpgEC27CFDA-6D8D-4F4D-8D9CE09BB1F1CD4B.jpgLarge.jpg



;) ;D ;)

Starman justice redevelopment.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
i guarantee you that more than one of my fellow members of the tribe (yeah i'm jewish) are currently googling this guy, forwarding his name to some foundation somewhere and investigating to see whether they can rustle up some evidence on him to forward to the justice department office that prosecutes world war two criminals. i would love to see this 87-year-old loser charged with war crimes -- if there is legitimate evidence.

that said, the guy's an idiot. this is america and he can say what he wants. people like this just open their mouth and everyone knows they are morons.
 
It's the South. They'll deny the Holocaust. They'll deny slavery's role in starting the Civil War. And they'll vote for G.W. Bush.
 
NoOneLikesUs said:
It's the South. They'll deny the Holocaust. They'll deny slavery's role in starting the Civil War. And they'll vote for G.W. Bush.
Huh? I thought this guy lived in Wisconsin.
 
Ace said:
I liked this part of the story. So they weren't trying to conquer all of Europe, they were freeing the Russian people from Communism? What a bunch of sweethearts.

Seriously! The Russians were burning their homes and all their possessions and running suicide missions rather than surrendering. You'd have thought they'd be throwing rose petals down in the Germans' goose stepping path...

What's amazing is that when Eisenhower first came across the Nazi death camps, he seemed to have anticipated that there would be a day when people would try to deny the attrocities. He got the video cameras in there, paraded as many U.S. servicemen as he could through (he summoned Patton, so he could see, too), and had the U.S. soldiers round up Germans from the surrounding areas and parade them through the camps. In places where there were piles of corpses left behind, they made the Germans from nearby towns cart the bodies and bury them. It was so unbelievable to him, that he wanted as many people as possible to see and document the horrors.

I'd say that denial is Orwellian, but denying the Hollocaust is actually even more sinister.
 
NoOneLikesUs said:
It's the South. They'll deny the Holocaust. They'll deny slavery's role in starting the Civil War. And they'll vote for G.W. Bush.

As a man with Southern roots and currently living in the South ... please ... Yes they will vote for Bush and even a few will deny the Civil War was about slavery. But the next person who denies the Holocaust will be the first.

- Sorry Hoops. Not sure if you'd see this thread. -
 
Ralph Waldo Henderson said:
NoOneLikesUs said:
It's the South. They'll deny the Holocaust. They'll deny slavery's role in starting the Civil War. And they'll vote for G.W. Bush.

As a man with Southern roots and currently living in the South ... please ... Yes they will vote for Bush and even a few will deny the Civil War was about slavery. But the next person who denies the Holocaust will be the first.

- Sorry Hoops. Not sure if you'd see this thread. -

Actually, Ralph -- and I know what you meant, so don't take this the wrong way -- but the next person to deny the holocaust would be the second.

Attorney General candidate Larry Darby has a firm grasp on No. 1.
 
armageddon said:
There is no way the paper can ignore this guy. From a jouralistic point of view it is an interesting story. Hell, I find it fascinating a guy like this believes what he does. Disturbing, but nonetheless fascinating.

I don't share his beliefs. I have no doubt the Holocaust is fact, not myth. But if we start silencing people just because we don't like their message...

Do we really want to travel that road?

Fascinating does not equal newsworthy.
One could argue that's one of the biggest problems facing the news industry today.

And, we're not silencing him. We're simply not offering him a platform.
Just like the nutcase who sends a three-page, rambling diatribe in smugged pencil isn't going to make the New York Times letters-to-the-editor; and the guy screaming bible verses outside Grand Central isn't worthy of his own 15-second spot in the evening news.


Most truths are so naked that people feel sorry for them and cover them up, at least a little bit.
-Edward R. Murrow
 
dog428 said:
Ralph Waldo Henderson said:
NoOneLikesUs said:
It's the South. They'll deny the Holocaust. They'll deny slavery's role in starting the Civil War. And they'll vote for G.W. Bush.

As a man with Southern roots and currently living in the South ... please ... Yes they will vote for Bush and even a few will deny the Civil War was about slavery. But the next person who denies the Holocaust will be the first.

- Sorry Hoops. Not sure if you'd see this thread. -

Actually, Ralph -- and I know what you meant, so don't take this the wrong way -- but the next person to deny the holocaust would be the second.

Attorney General candidate Larry Darby has a firm grasp on No. 1.

Well I meant in person to me, but yeah you got me there.
 
armageddon said:
PTOWN said:
Milwaukee has a huge Polish community, and I would think the backlash on this story will be catastrophic. It's not really even that interesting. Who cares about some back woods jag bag with an homage to Hitler?? The guys got to be out of his mind or just plain stupid to let the MJS talk to him.

Huge Polish community? You either haven't been to Milwaukee recently or are basing your assertion on reports from the '70s and '80s.

Seriously.

And for the record, no one would go so far as to call Elkhorn even a suburb of Milwaukee.

But I have a question regarding a larger issue.

How can anyone say this guy's views should be ignored, scoffed at or quashed just because we don't like his message? I think the guy is a loon, a dangerous loon.

But since when do we get to pick and choose whose views are worthy of being heard? 

There is no way the paper can ignore this guy. From a jouralistic point of view it is an interesting story. Hell, I find it fascinating a guy like this believes what he does. Disturbing, but nonetheless fascinating.

I don't share his beliefs. I have no doubt the Holocaust is fact, not myth. But if we start silencing people just because we don't like their message...

Do we really want to travel that road?


A friend of mine is a priest in Milwaukee at teh basilica, and has told me more than 75 percent of his parishoners are of polish stock. That's all I was basing it on because the diocese there is fairly sizeable (sorry to go all religous on you). The last time I was in Milwaukee, maybe early 2000s there were still plenty of polish enclaves. Why do you think the city is so famous for sausage?? The Polish of course.
 
buckweaver said:
And I'll pose the same question that was posed earlier: why do so many people seriously deny the Holocaust when there's so much OVERWHELMING AND TERRIBLE evidence to the contrary?

Or is that the reason -- because it's so overwhelming and terrible that you don't want to think that people are capable of doing this to other people?

But seriously -- why would you deny the Holocaust?
Because anti-semitism has existed for years and people will jump on any excuse to justify their hatred.  I'm generally an annoyingly optimistic person but some people just bring me down, ya know?
 
jay_christley said:
armageddon said:
There is no way the paper can ignore this guy. From a jouralistic point of view it is an interesting story. Hell, I find it fascinating a guy like this believes what he does. Disturbing, but nonetheless fascinating.

I don't share his beliefs. I have no doubt the Holocaust is fact, not myth. But if we start silencing people just because we don't like their message...

Do we really want to travel that road?

Fascinating does not equal newsworthy.
One could argue that's one of the biggest problems facing the news industry today.

And, we're not silencing him. We're simply not offering him a platform.
Just like the nutcase who sends a three-page, rambling diatribe in smugged pencil isn't going to make the New York Times letters-to-the-editor; and the guy screaming bible verses outside Grand Central isn't worthy of his own 15-second spot in the evening news.


Most truths are so naked that people feel sorry for them and cover them up, at least a little bit.
-Edward R. Murrow

Or like the soccer fans in Europe who taunt black players with words and bananas? I assume you thought those sad yet educational stories were a waste of time, too?

As a journalist and a human being I would want to know why this guy, in the year 2006, thinks Hitler was misunderstood and why he thinks the Holocaust is nothing more than a PR campaign designed by Jews.

If I can learn something about what makes him -- and others like him -- tick I'm in a better position to deal with the subject personally and professionally. Nazis/racists aren't going to disappear quietly.
 
PTOWN said:
armageddon said:
PTOWN said:
Milwaukee has a huge Polish community, and I would think the backlash on this story will be catastrophic. It's not really even that interesting. Who cares about some back woods jag bag with an homage to Hitler?? The guys got to be out of his mind or just plain stupid to let the MJS talk to him.

Huge Polish community? You either haven't been to Milwaukee recently or are basing your assertion on reports from the '70s and '80s.

Seriously.

And for the record, no one would go so far as to call Elkhorn even a suburb of Milwaukee.

But I have a question regarding a larger issue.

How can anyone say this guy's views should be ignored, scoffed at or quashed just because we don't like his message? I think the guy is a loon, a dangerous loon.

But since when do we get to pick and choose whose views are worthy of being heard? 

There is no way the paper can ignore this guy. From a jouralistic point of view it is an interesting story. Hell, I find it fascinating a guy like this believes what he does. Disturbing, but nonetheless fascinating.

I don't share his beliefs. I have no doubt the Holocaust is fact, not myth. But if we start silencing people just because we don't like their message...

Do we really want to travel that road?


A friend of mine is a priest in Milwaukee at teh basilica, and has told me more than 75 percent of his parishoners are of polish stock. That's all I was basing it on because the diocese there is fairly sizeable (sorry to go all religous on you). The last time I was in Milwaukee, maybe early 2000s there were still plenty of polish enclaves. Why do you think the city is so famous for sausage?? The Polish of course.

PTOWN:

I once called Milwaukee home.

Think of the Polish population there as you would Enron stock.

Milwaukee is still known for beer, too. But the beer makers are long gone.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top