Think before you send that e-mail

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Moderator1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Messages
32,791
Sorry, sort of, for the wire coding


Washington Post music critic apologizes for ’rude’ e-mail to former mayor’s aide <cm-bd>¶
WASHINGTON (AP) — A Pulitzer Prize-winning music critic for The Washington Post has apologized for sending an angry e-mail in which he called District of Columbia Council member Marion Barry a “crack addict.” <cm-bd>¶
Tim Page wrote to Barry’s aide last week after receiving a press release about the former mayor’s views on the financially troubled Greater Southeast Community Hospital. <cm-bd>¶
“Must we hear about it every time this crack addict attempts to rehabilitate himself with some new — and typically half-witted — political grandstanding?” the e-mail said. “I’d be grateful if you would take me off your mailing list. I cannot think of anything the useless Marion Barry could do that would interest me in the slightest, up to and including overdose.” <cm-bd>¶
Barry was videotaped in 1990, during his third term as mayor, smoking crack cocaine in a hotel room during an FBI sting. He served a six-month prison sentence. <cm-bd>¶
In a story published Tuesday in The Washington Post, Executive Editor Leonard Downie Jr. called Page’s e-mail “a terrible mistake” and said he had taken “appropriate internal action.” Neither Downie nor Page would disclose what the action was. Page plans to take a previously scheduled four-month leave starting Jan. 1. <cm-bd>¶
Downie also said Barry called him, and that Barry accepted his apology. <cm-bd>¶
In an e-mail to Barry’s aide, Andre Johnson, Page said he was sorry for his “rude” response. “I am deeply ashamed for what I did and I know how hateful my words could be.” <cm-bd>¶
Page said he had been cursed by a Barry staffer during an earlier phone request to be taken off the council member’s e-mail list. Johnson said he had no previous contact with Page and has no record of such a request. <cm-bd>¶
Barry said he was “outraged” at the e-mail, “particularly coming from a reporter at a reputable newspaper like The Washington Post, not a rag.” He said Page “ought to be fired, and The Washington Post ought to run an editorial apology.” <cm-bd>¶
Page won the Pulitzer for his music criticism in 1997, two years after joining the paper. <cm-bd>¶
 
Wait, isn't Barry actually a crack addict? I guess the truth hurts.
 
Can't you just ignore e-mails from certain senders?

And why would the music critic be receiving e-mails about a councilor's public policy?
 
I get "personal" emails from the former Governor, got 'em when he was Governor. Lots of politicians will blanket the media. They like to brag about how big theirs is - their e-mail list.
 
Moderator1 said:
I get "personal" emails from the former Governor, got 'em when he was Governor. Lots of politicians will blanket the media. They like to brag about how big theirs is - their e-mail list.

If you use Outlook, just use the rules function to block the e-mail address.

Or just delete it.

This guy seems like he's a little bit of a hothead.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
wicked said:
Can't you just ignore e-mails from certain senders?

And why would the music critic be receiving e-mails about a councilor's public policy?

Maybe you could send him an email and point it out. Might also mention that Tiffany and the Partridge Family are your bestest favorite singers.
 
Figures the Post would punish someone for ripping a Dem. ;)

Actually I think the punishment is bunk. Who cares what a music critic has to say about a local pol who essentially hassles him through email? How does that affect the job he does? Besides, pretty much anyone who isn't in Wards 7 and 8 feel the same way.
 
Flying Headbutt said:
Figures the Post would punish someone for ripping a Dem. ;)

Actually I think the punishment is bunk. Who cares what a music critic has to say about a local pol who essentially hassles him through email? How does that affect the job he does? Besides, pretty much anyone who isn't in Wards 7 and 8 feel the same way.

Yeah, but it's not professional. If he is treating this minor inconvenience this way, what is he like to readers who might call or write and actually disagree with him?
 
Ace said:
Flying Headbutt said:
Figures the Post would punish someone for ripping a Dem. ;)

Actually I think the punishment is bunk. Who cares what a music critic has to say about a local pol who essentially hassles him through email? How does that affect the job he does? Besides, pretty much anyone who isn't in Wards 7 and 8 feel the same way.

Yeah, but it's not professional. If he is treating this minor inconvenience this way, what is he like to readers who might call or write and actually disagree with him?

Sure, be the voice of reason and all that.
 
Flying Headbutt said:
Ace said:
Flying Headbutt said:
Figures the Post would punish someone for ripping a Dem. ;)

Actually I think the punishment is bunk. Who cares what a music critic has to say about a local pol who essentially hassles him through email? How does that affect the job he does? Besides, pretty much anyone who isn't in Wards 7 and 8 feel the same way.

Yeah, but it's not professional. If he is treating this minor inconvenience this way, what is he like to readers who might call or write and actually disagree with him?

Sure, be the voice of reason and all that.

Sorry. I'm off my game.
 
Ace said:
Flying Headbutt said:
Figures the Post would punish someone for ripping a Dem. ;)

Actually I think the punishment is bunk. Who cares what a music critic has to say about a local pol who essentially hassles him through email? How does that affect the job he does? Besides, pretty much anyone who isn't in Wards 7 and 8 feel the same way.

Yeah, but it's not professional. If he is treating this minor inconvenience this way, what is he like to readers who might call or write and actually disagree with him?

I guess it depends on whether his readers are crack-heads.
 
So, can we send those e-mails from personal accounts? Like I sent an e-mail to a company here in town with a glaring error on one of its billboards, basically saying "If you want to serve as a PR firm for any small company looking to grow, you might want to learn the difference between its and it's before it's 40 feet tall on a billboard."

I did it from a personal account...but now are we not allowed to be mad at people any more, even in our private lives?
 
imjustagirl said:
So, can we send those e-mails from personal accounts? Like I sent an e-mail to a company here in town with a glaring error on one of its billboards, basically saying "If you want to serve as a PR firm for any small company looking to grow, you might want to learn the difference between its and it's before it's 40 feet tall on a billboard."

I did it from a personal account...but now are we not allowed to be mad at people any more, even in our private lives?

If there's a more diplomatic way of doing things, always err on the side of caution.

Someone sending an e-mail reading, "I noticed a misspelling on your billboard" probably gets a little more response than someone being a douchebox about it.
 
imjustagirl said:
So, can we send those e-mails from personal accounts? Like I sent an e-mail to a company here in town with a glaring error on one of its billboards, basically saying "If you want to serve as a PR firm for any small company looking to grow, you might want to learn the difference between its and it's before it's 40 feet tall on a billboard."

I did it from a personal account...but now are we not allowed to be mad at people any more, even in our private lives?

No, you are not. If you wanted to correct the situation, you should have gotten a ladder and a paintbrush instead of your poison pen.

There is no way to make this situation a personal one, since they are sending the email to the staffer of the Washington Post, not Angry Music Writer, Private Citizen.
 
imjustagirl said:
So, can we send those e-mails from personal accounts? Like I sent an e-mail to a company here in town with a glaring error on one of its billboards, basically saying "If you want to serve as a PR firm for any small company looking to grow, you might want to learn the difference between its and it's before it's 40 feet tall on a billboard."

I did it from a personal account...but now are we not allowed to be mad at people any more, even in our private lives?

You're fired.
 
Why do I get the feeling that someone had to explain what e-mail was to Mr Barry as a precursor to the conversation?
 
Next thing you know, people will start saying that you shouldn't send professional emails late at night when you're really drunk.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top