The acronym dictionary

[boots]

From d_b to NSFW, the site has become acronym crazy. How about some definitions to help the acronym challenged.

 

[Simon_Cowbell]

From d_b to NSFW, the site has become acronym crazy. How about some definitions to help the acronym challenged.

STFU

 

[slappy4428]

From d_b to NSFW, the site has become acronym crazy. How about some definitions to help the acronym challenged.

STFU -- be quiet

STMF, U -- be very quiet

 

[sportschick]

Or you could just read the style guide.

http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/threads/29220/

 

[friend of a friend]

From d_b to NSFW, the site has become acronym crazy. How about some definitions to help the acronym challenged.

STFU

Classic

 

[boots]

Or you could just read the style guide.

http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/threads/29220/

THANK YOU VERY MUCH!!!!

 

[Football_Bat]

The old standby ... DTGDTN!

 

[budcrew08]

Could it be possible for the mods to sticky an acronym dictionary (or at little the SportsJournalists.com style guide) for newbs so they don't feel so ... newbish?

 

[SoSueMe]

From d_b to NSFW, the site has become acronym crazy. How about some definitions to help the acronym challenged.

STFU

How appropriate this was the first response. I'm still laughing.

 

[bigpern23]

Could it be possible for the mods to sticky an acronym dictionary (or at little the SportsJournalists.com style guide) for newbs so they don't feel so ... newbish?

But they are newbs. Shouldn't they feel newbish?

 

[heyabbott]

The old standby ... DTGDTN!

ASAP

 

[alleyallen]

SC, thanks for reviving the thread. With a last post in March, I can only imagine to which page it had fallen. I'm just too lazy to use the search function.

 

[Big Buckin' agate_monkey]

SC, thanks for reviving the thread. With a last post in March, I can only imagine to which page it had fallen. I'm just too lazy to use the search function.

That's the women are here for ... right?

 

[alleyallen]

SC, thanks for reviving the thread. With a last post in March, I can only imagine to which page it had fallen. I'm just too lazy to use the search function.

That's the women are here for ... right?

Uhm, wow. I think I'll step out of the way and let SC answer that.

<ducking>

 

[friend of a friend]

SC, thanks for reviving the thread. With a last post in March, I can only imagine to which page it had fallen. I'm just too lazy to use the search function.

Huh?

 

[Big Buckin' agate_monkey]

SC, thanks for reviving the thread. With a last post in March, I can only imagine to which page it had fallen. I'm just too lazy to use the search function.

Huh?

Or you could just read the style guide.

http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/threads/29220/

 

[friend of a friend]

SC, thanks for reviving the thread. With a last post in March, I can only imagine to which page it had fallen. I'm just too lazy to use the search function.

Huh?

Or you could just read the style guide.

http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/threads/29220/

Yeah, she replied five minutes after the thread was started. How is that reviving a dead thread?

 

[Big Buckin' agate_monkey]

SC, thanks for reviving the thread. With a last post in March, I can only imagine to which page it had fallen. I'm just too lazy to use the search function.

Huh?

Or you could just read the style guide.

http://www.sportsjournalists.com/forum/threads/29220/

Yeah, she replied nine minutes after the thread was started. How is that reviving a dead thread?

I think she's be thanked for reviving the thread she linked.

 

[alleyallen]

Friend...since SC posted the thread link, I just assumed she had gone and found it. I hadn't yet realized someone else had already posted.

Satisfied?

 

[friend of a friend]

Ahh, now I get it.