steroid testing in HS

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Breakyoself

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2004
Messages
749
City & State/Province
North Carolina
Florida put in a plan to start doing this next year for weightlifting, baseball and football. What other states are testing, or do they have other plans to deal with it. I know NJ tests. Thanks in advance, and sorry if this has been discussed before.
 
Every state should have testing. I've seen quite a few players over the years, who seem to gain way too much muscle over an offseason from one year to the next that it makes you wonder if they didn't have a little boost.
 
chazp said:
Every state should have testing. I've seen quite a few players over the years, who seem to gain way too much muscle over an offseason from one year to the next that it makes you wonder if they didn't have a little boost.

you look like a drug dealer. i think a cop and his dog should search your house every week.
 
Starman said:
Who's?
Going to Pay?
For It?

??? ::) ???
Have each school pay for it. They would turn around and add it to the activity fee they charge each athlete to play.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Tom Petty said:
chazp said:
Every state should have testing. I've seen quite a few players over the years, who seem to gain way too much muscle over an offseason from one year to the next that it makes you wonder if they didn't have a little boost.

you look like a drug dealer. i think a cop and his dog should search your house every week.
I'm busted. I apologize for this, but you see I couldn't make a enough money as a sportswriter and several kids in our area need to get bigger so I...
 
chazp said:
Tom Petty said:
chazp said:
Every state should have testing. I've seen quite a few players over the years, who seem to gain way too much muscle over an offseason from one year to the next that it makes you wonder if they didn't have a little boost.

you look like a drug dealer. i think a cop and his dog should search your house every week.
I'm busted. I apologize for this, but you see I couldn't make a enough money as a sportswriter and several kids in our area need to get bigger so I...

i think you missed the point.
 
In Ohio, it's up to each individual school. Most of the testing in our area is of drivers and participants in extra-curricular activities, and it's for recreational drugs and not performance enhancers (we were told that would be too expensive).
 
chazp said:
Starman said:
Who's?
Going to Pay?
For It?

??? ::) ???
Have each school pay for it. They would turn around and add it to the activity fee they charge each athlete to play.

What activity fee? The only sport I've ever heard of that costs anything just to play is hockey, because of ice time.
 
Clever username said:
chazp said:
Starman said:
Who's?
Going to Pay?
For It?

??? ::) ???
Have each school pay for it. They would turn around and add it to the activity fee they charge each athlete to play.

What activity fee? The only sport I've ever heard of that costs anything just to play is hockey, because of ice time.

My high school growing up had fees for ASB cards. The money was put toward athletics.
In Idaho, a lot of the small schools were going to "pay to play" where athletes had to pay $50 or more per sport they wanted to play. There were discounts for multiple sport athletes and multiple athletes in a family. The districts cited rising travel costs as the reason.
 
Angola! said:
Clever username said:
chazp said:
Starman said:
Who's?
Going to Pay?
For It?

??? ::) ???
Have each school pay for it. They would turn around and add it to the activity fee they charge each athlete to play.

What activity fee? The only sport I've ever heard of that costs anything just to play is hockey, because of ice time.

My high school growing up had fees for ASB cards. The money was put toward athletics.
In Idaho, a lot of the small schools were going to "pay to play" where athletes had to pay $50 or more per sport they wanted to play. There were discounts for multiple sport athletes and multiple athletes in a family. The districts cited rising travel costs as the reason.

I see. I don't agree with the practice, but I see.
 
chazp said:
Starman said:
Who's?
Going to Pay?
For It?

??? ::) ???
Have each school pay for it. They would turn around and add it to the activity fee they charge each athlete to play.

Steroid testing costs $100+ per head, per test.

A lot of parents don't have $100 more just lying around they can throw away on a steroids test.

If I'm a parent, and they come at me with this bull****, I tell them:

"YOU pay for the test. If my kid tests positive, I'll reimburse you for it. Otherwise, go **** in your hat."
 
The different versions of the Texas bill had different ways of funding testing. The Senate version called for the state to put up the money. The Legislature's version called for a 50 cent surcharge on tickets for all high school sporting events. I never did here which method wound up in what was sent to the Governor.

Also, I believe the proposed program, which would be administered by the University Interscholastic League, was to test roughly one percent of all high school athletes.
 
[/quote]

What activity fee? The only sport I've ever heard of that costs anything just to play is hockey, because of ice time.
[/quote]

Depends on where you are, I guess.

Here in the Northeast, it's a very common way to balance school budgets.
 
Starman said:
chazp said:
Starman said:
Who's?
Going to Pay?
For It?

??? ::) ???
Have each school pay for it. They would turn around and add it to the activity fee they charge each athlete to play.

Steroid testing costs $100+ per head, per test.

A lot of parents don't have $100 more just lying around they can throw away on a steroids test.

If I'm a parent, and they come at me with this bull****, I tell them:

"YOU pay for the test. If my kid tests positive, I'll reimburse you for it. Otherwise, go **** in your hat."

And they tell you that playing sports is a privilege, not a right, and you have to pay for the privilege.

The court's gonna be behind them.
 
Tom Petty said:
chazp said:
Every state should have testing. I've seen quite a few players over the years, who seem to gain way too much muscle over an offseason from one year to the next that it makes you wonder if they didn't have a little boost.

you look like a drug dealer. i think a cop and his dog should search your house every week.

If it's mandatory testing for all athletes, then how is it unconstitutional?
 
three_bags_full said:
Tom Petty said:
chazp said:
Every state should have testing. I've seen quite a few players over the years, who seem to gain way too much muscle over an offseason from one year to the next that it makes you wonder if they didn't have a little boost.

you look like a drug dealer. i think a cop and his dog should search your house every week.

If it's mandatory testing for all athletes, then how is it unconstitutional?

if it's mandatory searches of all houses, then how is it unconstitutional?
 
Please see Earls v. Oklahoma.
The current Supreme Court, which wouldn't know a civil liberty from a houseplant, says they can test.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top