Seattle shooting coverage

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Smallpotatoes

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2002
Messages
14,999
I've heard some bellyaching that the media is ignoring or downplaying last Friday's shooting at the Seattle Jewish center.
The media is downplaying the fact that the shooter is a Muslim, that it was an act of terrorism,a hate crime, etc. One person even had a problem with the placement of armed guards at mosques in Seattle (I suppose he felt it would have been appropriate for someone to go on a shooting spree at a mosque in retaliation).
These people also complain that the media is favoring Hezbollah (sp?) in the conflict with Israel. I don't really see that, but I guess one of the dangers in not taking sides is that everyone assumes you're taking the other guy's side.
Many of these same people who make these complaints are also the same ones who go on and on about how Jews control the media. How can Jews control the media and the media be anti-Semitic at the same time?
 
Almost_Famous said:
I will concur. I haven't heard anyone talking about this at all. Did anyone die?

I've seen plenty of coverage of this shooting. Some people are just too sensitive, perhaps.
 
One person dead. Piece of **** used a 13-year-old girl as a shield to enter the center ... seemingly unaware how perfectly that falls in line with what every stereotype of Muslim extremists are. Living in the Pacific Northwest, I've seen a boatload of coverage, but I don't know why it would draw much nationally. One random idiot. One random Muslim idiot during a time of heightened conflict, certainly, but a random idiot nonetheless.
 
Lester Bangs said:
One person dead. Piece of **** used a 13-year-old girl as a shield to enter the center ... seemingly unaware how perfectly that falls in line with what every stereotype of Muslim extremists are.

Forgive me if I misunderstand, but are you suggesting it would have been better if he had just wandered in with guns blazing or a bomb strapped to his chest?

Lester Bangs said:
Living in the Pacific Northwest, I've seen a boatload of coverage, but I don't know why it would draw much nationally. One random idiot. One random Muslim idiot during a time of heightened conflict, certainly, but a random idiot nonetheless.

It hasn't drawn a lot of coverage nationally, at least since it happened. But it should, for the same reason a neo-nazi shooting spree at a synagogue would. The people that are pissed about the lack of coverage feel like Islam gets a pass when it comes to violent or intolerant acts, while other groups are raked over the coals. Look at what's happened to Mel Gibson (a few words from a random drunken idiot) and how it's been covered compared to the Seattle shooting.
 
Little Man's Daddy said:
Almost_Famous said:
I will concur. I haven't heard anyone talking about this at all. Did anyone die?

I've seen plenty of coverage of this shooting. Some people are just too sensitive, perhaps.

It was covered, briefly and buried.

This was the worst hate crime in America since James Byrd or Matthew Sheppard. Yet Mel Gibson's drunken binge got more coverage.
 
Yeah, and somehow, Lebanon's blown Iraq off the top of the newscasts, too.
Function of the shrinking news-hole, maybe.
 
Smallpotatoes said:
I've heard some bellyaching that the media is ignoring or downplaying last Friday's shooting at the Seattle Jewish center.
The media is downplaying the fact that the shooter is a Muslim, that it was an act of terrorism,a hate crime, etc. One person even had a problem with the placement of armed guards at mosques in Seattle (I suppose he felt it would have been appropriate for someone to go on a shooting spree at a mosque in retaliation).
These people also complain that the media is favoring Hezbollah (sp?) in the conflict with Israel. I don't really see that, but I guess one of the dangers in not taking sides is that everyone assumes you're taking the other guy's side.
Many of these same people who make these complaints are also the same ones who go on and on about how Jews control the media. How can Jews control the media and the media be anti-Semitic at the same time?


What can we do about that.
 
COCKDIAN said:
Smallpotatoes said:
I've heard some bellyaching that the media is ignoring or downplaying last Friday's shooting at the Seattle Jewish center.
The media is downplaying the fact that the shooter is a Muslim, that it was an act of terrorism,a hate crime, etc. One person even had a problem with the placement of armed guards at mosques in Seattle (I suppose he felt it would have been appropriate for someone to go on a shooting spree at a mosque in retaliation).
These people also complain that the media is favoring Hezbollah (sp?) in the conflict with Israel. I don't really see that, but I guess one of the dangers in not taking sides is that everyone assumes you're taking the other guy's side.
Many of these same people who make these complaints are also the same ones who go on and on about how Jews control the media. How can Jews control the media and the media be anti-Semitic at the same time?


What can we do about that.

Is that declarative?
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Yeah, and somehow, Lebanon's blown Iraq off the top of the newscasts, too.
Function of the shrinking news-hole, maybe.

And shrinking attention spans.
 
Last night, Michael Savage was outraged that the police in Seattle were protecting mosques.
Why would anyone who has made it through the third grade, never mind supposedly received a Ph.D from Cal, advocate having the Jewish community in Seattle forming a lynch mob and engaging in tit-for-tat retaliatory strikes against the city's Islamic community?
It's not just about proecting innocent Muslims in Seattle from the kind of crap that's going on in the Mideast, it's also about keeping everyone in Seattle who isn't a Jew or a Muslim from getting caught in the middle.
 
Inky_Wretch said:
Did Savage mention this guy wasn't a Muslim, since he'd converted?

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/279424_convert30ww.html

Apparently that little tidbit didn't fit in with his whole agenda.
 
heyabbott said:
Little Man's Daddy said:
Almost_Famous said:
I will concur. I haven't heard anyone talking about this at all. Did anyone die?

I've seen plenty of coverage of this shooting. Some people are just too sensitive, perhaps.

It was covered, briefly and buried.

This was the worst hate crime in America since James Byrd or Matthew Sheppard. Yet Mel Gibson's drunken binge got more coverage.

I will point out that Mel Gibson is a famous person. Perhaps you've heard of him before.
 
Hoo said:
heyabbott said:
Little Man's Daddy said:
Almost_Famous said:
I will concur. I haven't heard anyone talking about this at all. Did anyone die?

I've seen plenty of coverage of this shooting. Some people are just too sensitive, perhaps.

It was covered, briefly and buried.

This was the worst hate crime in America since James Byrd or Matthew Sheppard. Yet Mel Gibson's drunken binge got more coverage.

I will point out that Mel Gibson is a famous person. Perhaps you've heard of him before.
A famous person got drunk and said some silly things. An anti-semeteic psychopath walked into a Jewish Communtiy center shoot 6 (presumably)Jewish women, including a pregnant woman. Killing 1 serious wounding the other 5. And said some silly things.

The media tended to over cover the rantings of a drunk withou a gun, rather than a pscho who used a gun.
 
heyabbott said:
Hoo said:
heyabbott said:
Little Man's Daddy said:
Almost_Famous said:
I will concur. I haven't heard anyone talking about this at all. Did anyone die?

I've seen plenty of coverage of this shooting. Some people are just too sensitive, perhaps.

It was covered, briefly and buried.

This was the worst hate crime in America since James Byrd or Matthew Sheppard. Yet Mel Gibson's drunken binge got more coverage.

I will point out that Mel Gibson is a famous person. Perhaps you've heard of him before.
A famous person got drunk and said some silly things. An anti-semeteic psychopath walked into a Jewish Communtiy center shoot 6 (presumably)Jewish women, including a pregnant woman. Killing 1 serious wounding the other 5. And said some silly things.

The media tended to over cover the rantings of a drunk withou a gun, rather than a pscho who used a gun.

well, i'm just pointing out why the disparity is there.
 
Hoo said:
heyabbott said:
Hoo said:
heyabbott said:
Little Man's Daddy said:
Almost_Famous said:
I will concur. I haven't heard anyone talking about this at all. Did anyone die?

I've seen plenty of coverage of this shooting. Some people are just too sensitive, perhaps.

It was covered, briefly and buried.

This was the worst hate crime in America since James Byrd or Matthew Sheppard. Yet Mel Gibson's drunken binge got more coverage.

I will point out that Mel Gibson is a famous person. Perhaps you've heard of him before.
A famous person got drunk and said some silly things. An anti-semeteic psychopath walked into a Jewish Communtiy center shoot 6 (presumably)Jewish women, including a pregnant woman. Killing 1 serious wounding the other 5. And said some silly things.

The media tended to over cover the rantings of a drunk withou a gun, rather than a pscho who used a gun.

well, i'm just pointing out why the disparity is there.

Fairfly stiff indictment of professional journalism as a simple minded excerise by shallow people for a moronic audience..
 

Latest posts

Back
Top