Football_Bat
Well-Known Member
Age 85.
http://www.nytimes.com/?smid=tw-bna&bna=2822
http://www.nytimes.com/?smid=tw-bna&bna=2822
21 said:What we need is a Running Law Thread.
21 said:What we need is a Running Law Thread.
Armchair_QB said:He was good with Clients.
21 said:What we need is a Running Law Thread.
Boom_70 said:21 said:What we need is a Running Law Thread.
You should always run opposite of traffic
Bork was a Reagan nominee who was ultimately replaced by Scalia, I believe -- either Scalia or Anthony Kennedy. Clarence Thomas was a Bush 41 pick some years later.qtlaw said:Abe Vigoda survives.
Mr. Bork represents to me the unfortunate turn for the worse of Senate confirmation of judicial nominees. Although I was not a huge fan of his views, he appeared to be a qualified nominee and should have been confirmed. Instead, we got Mr. Silence who's claim to fame is he got into law school under affirmative action yet rails against it. Instead of Bork being a reminder that the confirmation process should not be politicized, the parties have sadly become even more entrenched.
doctorx said:Bork was a Reagan nominee who was ultimately replaced by Scalia, I believe -- either Scalia or Anthony Kennedy. Clarence Thomas was a Bush 41 pick some years later.qtlaw said:Abe Vigoda survives.
Mr. Bork represents to me the unfortunate turn for the worse of Senate confirmation of judicial nominees. Although I was not a huge fan of his views, he appeared to be a qualified nominee and should have been confirmed. Instead, we got Mr. Silence who's claim to fame is he got into law school under affirmative action yet rails against it. Instead of Bork being a reminder that the confirmation process should not be politicized, the parties have sadly become even more entrenched.
doctorx said:Bork was a Reagan nominee who was ultimately replaced by Scalia, I believe -- either Scalia or Anthony Kennedy. Clarence Thomas was a Bush 41 pick some years later.qtlaw said:Abe Vigoda survives.
Mr. Bork represents to me the unfortunate turn for the worse of Senate confirmation of judicial nominees. Although I was not a huge fan of his views, he appeared to be a qualified nominee and should have been confirmed. Instead, we got Mr. Silence who's claim to fame is he got into law school under affirmative action yet rails against it. Instead of Bork being a reminder that the confirmation process should not be politicized, the parties have sadly become even more entrenched.
zagoshe said:Robert Bork probably is the guy who tipped the scales forever and ensured we will never get another Supreme Court judge appointed and approved based on merits and qualifications.
It is hilarious to me how one side declares there should not be a "litmus test" for Supreme Court justices - then puts their own nominee through a series of litmus tests to make sure they will rule on law their way.
It is no longer about the law and almost 100 percent about politics.
Armchair_QB said:And we can thank the partisan hack Democrats who railroaded Bork for that.