Gutter said:Between the Conference Championships and the Super Bowl.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3798734
Probably would put a bit more interest into the game ... a bit.
outofplace said:Gutter said:Between the Conference Championships and the Super Bowl.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3798734
Probably would put a bit more interest into the game ... a bit.
I'm assuming they would be playing without any players from the Super Bowl participants, further weakening the talent level in the game that is already limited because so many players drop out.
AlleyAllen said:I'd much prefer to have the college title game held at the same stadium as the Super Bowl, in the week prior. Who cares about the Pro Bowl?
DanOregon said:It actually makes a lot of sense. Gives people something to talk about in the weeks in between the championship games and the Super Bowl, gets a lot of players to the Super Bowl site and might give them a few more opportunities to be paid to attend corporate gigs, the Super Bowl participants largely begged off the Pro Bowl anyway.
Maybe they can make it so the winning Pro Bowl conference determines which is the "home" team in the Super Bowl.
txsportsscribe said:they still play the pro bowl?
Report: Pro Bowl to beheldmeaningless and unwatchable even before the Super Bowl, beginning in 2010
outofplace said:I don't know why they even bother at this point. Why not just pick the teams, send everybody who makes it a little plaque and move on? The game usually sucks and players don't really want to take a chance on getting hurt.
I'm a football junkie and I don't even bother watching any more.
They'll comp them tickets to the Super Bowl so they can sell them on ebay and make twice what it would cost to go to Hawaiispnited said:outofplace said:Gutter said:Between the Conference Championships and the Super Bowl.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3798734
Probably would put a bit more interest into the game ... a bit.
I'm assuming they would be playing without any players from the Super Bowl participants, further weakening the talent level in the game that is already limited because so many players drop out.
And without the all-expense-paid vacation in Hawaii, even more are going to skip it now.
It makes no ****ing sense whatever. Without the players from the two Super Bowl teams, you'll be reduced to watching David Garrard and Jason Campbell as the starting quarterbacks. This is the worst idea I've ever heard. They need to bag the game entirely, and just pick an All-Star team.DanOregon said:It actually makes a lot of sense. Gives people something to talk about in the weeks in between the championship games and the Super Bowl, gets a lot of players to the Super Bowl site and might give them a few more opportunities to be paid to attend corporate gigs, the Super Bowl participants largely begged off the Pro Bowl anyway.
Maybe they can make it so the winning Pro Bowl conference determines which is the "home" team in the Super Bowl.
hondo said:It makes no ****ing sense whatever. Without the players from the two Super Bowl teams, you'll be reduced to watching David Garrard and Jason Campbell as the starting quarterbacks.