NYC to LA in 12 minutes

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Not so fast, my friend ... DARPA has lost contact with the HTV-2 (hypersonic technology vehicle).
 
But will it have wifi? And will you be able to use your cellphone? "Hey there, they're shutting the door ... hang on a sec ... OK, we're landing, I'll be at gate B-23."
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
It doesn't sound like it's too close to doing the whole LAX to JFK route for passengers anytime soon. :D
 
I'd be willing to wager this thing carries bombs, not passengers for a long while.
 
Oh, good. Now we can bomb the bad guys much quicker. Those tense moments waiting for the bomber on TV shows won't be filmed anymore.
 
Doesn't matter. FAA limits your airspeed.

The source is Part 91 of the Federal Aviation Regulation.

§ 91.117 Aircraft speed.

(a) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate an aircraft below 10,000 feet MSL at an indicated airspeed of more than 250 knots (288 m.p.h.).

(b) Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of the primary airport of a Class C or Class D airspace area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph.). This paragraph (b) does not apply to any operations within a Class B airspace area. Such operations shall comply with paragraph (a) of this section.

(c) No person may operate an aircraft in the airspace underlying a Class B airspace area designated for an airport or in a VFR corridor designated through such a Class B airspace area, at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph).

(d) If the minimum safe airspeed for any particular operation is greater than the maximum speed prescribed in this section, the aircraft may be operated at that minimum speed.

Edit to add source.
 
Rules be damned, when I want me an In-and-Out burger...damnit, I'm going to get there and back for my lunch break!
 
Shouldn't we be beyond hypersonic jets and into the age of the teleporter by now?

And where's my ****ing hoverboard?
 
bigpern23 said:
Not so fast, my friend ... DARPA has lost contact with the HTV-2 (hypersonic technology vehicle).

Lost at sea.
You could still say things are going swimmingly . . .
 
MisterCreosote said:
Bubbler said:
Flying cars, dude, flying cars.

With the amount of ****ty drivers this world already has? I'll stick with my hoverboard.

The ****ty driver thing always makes me think twice about flying cars, especially the drunk drivers. Everyone would almost have to be armed with a breathalizer out of the factory. Actually they should almost think about doing that with cars now.
 
three_bags_full said:
Doesn't matter. FAA limits your airspeed.

The source is Part 91 of the Federal Aviation Regulation.

§ 91.117 Aircraft speed.

(a) Unless otherwise authorized by the Administrator, no person may operate an aircraft below 10,000 feet MSL at an indicated airspeed of more than 250 knots (288 m.p.h.).

(b) Unless otherwise authorized or required by ATC, no person may operate an aircraft at or below 2,500 feet above the surface within 4 nautical miles of the primary airport of a Class C or Class D airspace area at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph.). This paragraph (b) does not apply to any operations within a Class B airspace area. Such operations shall comply with paragraph (a) of this section.

(c) No person may operate an aircraft in the airspace underlying a Class B airspace area designated for an airport or in a VFR corridor designated through such a Class B airspace area, at an indicated airspeed of more than 200 knots (230 mph).

(d) If the minimum safe airspeed for any particular operation is greater than the maximum speed prescribed in this section, the aircraft may be operated at that minimum speed.

Edit to add source.
1. Regulations change.
2. Couldn't the plane just go normal speed under 10,000 feet and then floor it at higher altitude?

This would be pretty cool. Probably not a practical affordable part of people's lives for 20+ years, which I base on, well, nothing.
 
Maybe one of you guys can clarify, but wasn't it planned the flight of the craft would be terminated by ditching it into the ocean? So this isn't exactly a failed mission, is it?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top