NBA: Will you be watching when? ANSWER:NO!

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

footballworld

Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2006
Messages
44
Probably the worst catch phrase ever!


Can you think of any other that is worse?


http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=220830class=regular
 
Honestly, the last time I watched an NBA final I was 12.

I don't think I'll be watching again this year.
 
ESPN! ESP ... in your face!

Or ESPN pigout. One or the other.
 
I haven't truly been interested since MJ retired. My level of interest now is contingent upon whether I'm desking during a game. If I'm not, I'm sure as hell not watching on my day off.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Blame the Sopranos (possible, but let's be real here) instead of the series? Sure, why not.
 
Will you be watching when the Spurs destroy the Cavs by 40?

Lost all interest when PHX and GST were eliminated.
 
crusoes said:
slappy4428 said:
buh... buh... buh...

ahh, hell.. I'd rather watch paint dry or my dog ****...
I might rather watch your dog **** dry paint.

You'd be better off watching T.C. Cameroon officiate a ball game.. far more farsical...
 
stephenaapologize.jpg




 
Im tellin' ya'll, i've watched the past two games. The cavs have a chance to make this competitive. Especially with the 2-3-2 format.
And if it does end up being competitive, I'll find it hard to believe that you all wouldn't want to see LeBron get his first ring.
 
I posted this on the I Heart MLB thread, but it bears repeating here:

hockeybeat said:
I would rather watch Bea Arthur make love to Abe Vigoda on a flaming bed of nails than watch a NBA game. And I have no desire to see Bea Arthur or Abe Vigoda.
 
AlleyAllen said:
Chuck~Taylor said:
I'd rather have papercuts between my toes than watch a inning of baseball

To each his own, obviously.

Hey Chuck, I understand defending your favorite sport, but now you really can't post about the Tigers later this summer.
 
hockeybeat said:
I posted this on the I Heart MLB thread, but it bears repeating here:

hockeybeat said:
I would rather watch Bea Arthur make love to Abe Vigoda on a flaming bed of nails than watch a NBA game. And I have no desire to see Bea Arthur or Abe Vigoda.

you are my new hero...
 
slappy4428 said:
hockeybeat said:
I posted this on the I Heart MLB thread, but it bears repeating here:
hockeybeat said:
I would rather watch Bea Arthur make love to Abe Vigoda on a flaming bed of nails than watch a NBA game. And I have no desire to see Bea Arthur or Abe Vigoda.
you are my new hero...
I feel all warm and fuzzy inside.
 
Chuck~Taylor said:
Im tellin' ya'll, i've watched the past two games. The cavs have a chance to make this competitive. Especially with the 2-3-2 format.
And if it does end up being competitive, I'll find it hard to believe that you all wouldn't want to see LeBron get his first ring.

Actually, Chuck, I think the 2-3-2 format makes it more difficult for an underdog to make the series competitive, especially if they don't win one of the first two on the road. Winning three in games in a row in any playoff series is difficult, never mind blowing your homecourt advantage load in one wad.

I think it's easier in the 2-2-1-1-1 format. Then all you have to do is win two home games in a row, hold serve in Game 6 and anything can happen in Game 7. Against a better opponent who wins their first two home games, you absolutely must win all three home games or you're toast. Your chances of winning two road games, already down 3-2, to close out a series are slim at best.

Cavs are done in five.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top