I'm an OKC fan, and if the Thunder make it past Denver, I'd rather see it play San Antonio than Memphis. Grizzlies scare me, too.Blitz said:You won't find very many San Antonians who aren't worried now with Memphis. That team's already beaten the Spurs twice in the regular season and now today's result ... this one, sadly for the older Spurs, might drag out to 6 or 7 games.
How do you define the "really, really good teams"? Because a lot of them are playing each other right now, even though it's the first round, which leaves little room for this supposed sleepwalking that you're referring to.RickStain said:holy bull said:Anybody bad-mouthing the NBA probably needs to take a closer look at the playoffs. OKC and Denver are both legitimate Western Conference champs, and they're playing each other in the FIRST ROUND. The matchups are all great, playoff basketball in the NBA is amazing, you've got Knicks-Celtics just for laughs ... what's not to like?
The fact that the really, really good teams can sleepwalk for 40 minutes, then turn it on and win. And even the Lakers will likely have little problem winning the series in the end.
But it has been an awesome first two days.
Small Town Guy said:Fouls are always going to be cause for controversy. When do you call hand-checking, when don't you? Charge or block? How much do you let them get away with in the post? Refs should get a pass for missing some calls with those.
What you can't miss is an obvious offensive goaltending that gives a team a one-point lead with about a minute to go, which is what happened in the OKC game. Denver blew three straight possessions when they had the chance to up the lead to 3, but they should have had a fourth opportunity but for the missed call.
Small Town Guy said:What you can't miss is an obvious offensive goaltending that gives a team a one-point lead with about a minute to go, which is what happened in the OKC game. Denver blew three straight possessions when they had the chance to up the lead to 3, but they should have had a fourth opportunity but for the missed call.
Bob Cook said:These games ones are a nice palate cleanser after the **** sandwich that was this year's NCAA men's final. The OKC-Denver game could have provided every play for the ESPN Top 10 all by itself. If you say you like basketball, you owe it to yourself to watch these games.
Football_Bat said:The West could end up looking like the NHL playoffs where the 5, 6, 7 and 8 seeds win the first round. Sure, Dallas and OKC won their openers at home, but that's no guarantee.
The Hornets may have hit on a formula that finally works this year: Let Kobe score his, and stop the other four. And I was at no point this year blown away by the Spurs.
dreunc1542 said:Football_Bat said:The West could end up looking like the NHL playoffs where the 5, 6, 7 and 8 seeds win the first round. Sure, Dallas and OKC won their openers at home, but that's no guarantee.
The Hornets may have hit on a formula that finally works this year: Let Kobe score his, and stop the other four. And I was at no point this year blown away by the Spurs.
As JC said on the hockey thread, people draw entirely too many conclusions based on game one of a long series.
Small Town Guy said:dreunc1542 said:Football_Bat said:The West could end up looking like the NHL playoffs where the 5, 6, 7 and 8 seeds win the first round. Sure, Dallas and OKC won their openers at home, but that's no guarantee.
The Hornets may have hit on a formula that finally works this year: Let Kobe score his, and stop the other four. And I was at no point this year blown away by the Spurs.
As JC said on the hockey thread, people draw entirely too many conclusions based on game one of a long series.
A hot Aaron Grey is not the same as a hot goalie?
The one lower seed I still think has the best shot of winning is the one that lost the first game, Portland. The Manu injury changes things, but I still see the Lakers and Spurs series going the way of the lower seed stealing Game 1 but ultimately falling in five or six. I think every game of OKC and Denver will go down to the wire and Denver's as tough as anyone at home, but finally that lack of a real go-to guy will hurt them. Last night in the last three minutes they couldn't figure out where to go on offense, even though they have a ton of options the first 45 minutes.
Michael_ Gee said:The fact of the matter is, Anthony is one of those odd superior talents (there's no denying that) who you're better off without.
Michael_ Gee said:Yes, I do. Anthony is, like Allan Iverson, a player who's most effective when he's the ONE superstar on a team. Bringing him in to pair with Stoudemire was a mistake.
It's not like I think Anthony isn't a superior talent. He surely is. He's just one of those talents who's not a good fit with comparable talents on one team.
bigpern23 said:Michael_ Gee said:Yes, I do. Anthony is, like Allan Iverson, a player who's most effective when he's the ONE superstar on a team. Bringing him in to pair with Stoudemire was a mistake.
It's not like I think Anthony isn't a superior talent. He surely is. He's just one of those talents who's not a good fit with comparable talents on one team.
You're nuts if you think the Knicks as constituted are worse than they were before the trade.
MisterCreosote said:I think the Knicks are better with Melo, but last night he didn't seem to cognizant of the fact that, in the second half, he couldn't hit the broad side of a barn while Stoudemire was pretty lights-out. Defer, man.
bigpern23 said:Michael_ Gee said:The fact of the matter is, Anthony is one of those odd superior talents (there's no denying that) who you're better off without.
Carmelo averaged 30 ppg in the playoffs last year. He scored 27 ppg in 2009 to take the Nuggets - THE NUGGETS - to the Western Conference finals. He has taken his team to the postseason every year of his career, including his rookie season when Denver went from 17-65 to 43-39? And you think the Knicks are better off without him? Really?