MLB '24 Regular Season Thread

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Songbird

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2005
Messages
55,948
Welcome to a new season.

Dodgers and Padres playing in Seoul. Watching on ESPN on the laptop.

Darvish opened the season with a pitch clock violation walk to Betts but got Ohtani on a fielder's choice (beat it out to avoid a 6-4-3), Freeman (strikeout looking), and Will Smith (F7).

Glasnow just retired the Padres 1-2-3.

And here we go into a new season.

upload_2024-3-20_6-23-37.png
 
Routine grounder busted through Cronenworth's glove, run scored.


glove.png
 
Dodgers must have thought they were still in the postseason, 0-for-8 with runners in scoring position until they used an error to stack some runs in the eighth.
 
I didn't have Jake Cronenworth's glove on my bingo card as the Game 1 MVP.

They have clubhouse guys who can tighten that up for you, bud.
 
No, it wouldn't. Batter hit the ball, runner scored, RBI.

How funny that that it's an RBI if the batter beats it out at first for a force only.

It's a facacta rule. Batter did his job, to plate a run, which is the name of the game.
 
No, it wouldn't. Batter hit the ball, runner scored, RBI.

How funny that that it's an RBI if the batter beats it out at first for a force only.

It's a facacta rule. Batter did his job, to plate a run, which is the name of the game.
And produced 2 outs, hell of an at bat.
 
There is a good argument to give an RBI for a DP, but it has nothing to do with whether or not he did his job. People used to think that RBIs were a good way to measure how often the hitter did his job, and it was a gold star, so it was withheld when he was perceived to have done more harm than good.
These days we (most of us) realize that this is a poor way to evaluate how good a hitter is, but we keep track of them anyway. Partially because of nostalgia, but also because it's not entirely worthless. It's a data point that helps keep track of what occurred. As a limited utility stat, it has one job: count how often the hitter at bat caused the runners (or himself) to score. If that's the job, we shouldn't be making value judgements about which ones we like better than others (remember the GWRBI in the box scores?). Let it measure what it claims to measure as accurately as possible.
 
Old man shakes fist at cloud moment: I miss the old Opening Day. Monday afternoon start, first game in Cincinnati and a bunch of teams play.

I am also aware that will never again be the case.
 
Old man shakes fist at cloud moment: I miss the old Opening Day. Monday afternoon start, first game in Cincinnati and a bunch of teams play.

I am also aware that will never again be the case.
Cincinnati and Washington. Have the Nats ever hosted a presidential opener?
 
These days we (most of us) realize that this is a poor way to evaluate how good a hitter is,

Yes and No.

I want a guy with a knack for driving in runs and getting those ribbies. RBIs matter.

Full stop.

We have many metrics to evaluate the whole of a batter. I love many of those metrics.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top