Message to the sj.cops.

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yawn

New Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2006
Messages
4,505
Locking the Kennedy thread? That's simply brilliant.

No warnings, no pointing out foul play, just shut the damn thing down and leave everyone to point the finger. How about a comment first to the people (plural) who threaten that action?


I'm glad you guys aren't cops. And great work at blocking personal messages directed at you.
 
Time to send Yawn on a very long vacation.

I hear Gitmo is nice this time of year.
 
Yawn said:
Locking the Kennedy thread? That's simply brilliant.

No warnings, no pointing out foul play, just shut the damn thing down and leave everyone to point the finger. How about a comment first to the people (plural) who threaten that action?


I'm glad you guys aren't cops. And great work at blocking personal messages directed at you.

Yeah, implied I was a cross-dresser and backed off it like a coward in the same sentence on the Kennedy thread.
Yeah, it's always us, ain't it?
 
spnited said:
Time to send Yawn on a very long vacation.

I hear Gitmo is nice this time of year.
Moron. It's OK to shout disrespect at Bush II, Reagan...but someone mentions Mary Jo during Kennedy's struggle with his health and the leftnuts go off. If one of you idiots who think that way could read, you'd see that in the very first post I made on the Kennedy thread it suggested that he almost got the 1980 nomination in spite of his past, and that later, I said a Kennedy-Reagan race for the White House would have been nothing short of captivating.

Some of you are just so warped everytime you see the Che avatar that you knee-jerk.
 
markvid said:
Yawn said:
Locking the Kennedy thread? That's simply brilliant.

No warnings, no pointing out foul play, just shut the damn thing down and leave everyone to point the finger. How about a comment first to the people (plural) who threaten that action?


I'm glad you guys aren't cops. And great work at blocking personal messages directed at you.

Yeah, implied I was a cross-dresser and backed off it like a coward in the same sentence on the Kennedy thread.
Yeah, it's always us, ain't it?

Again, you can't read, can you? Take your ass to the cross-dressing comment and read it word for word. The only implication is that your rants at me are as much a waste of your time as it would be for you to go buy a dress.

If you don't see that, you're not very smart.
 
Can't post without name-calling or insults. You prove it time and time again, and why nothing is done about you is beyond me.
 
markvid said:
Can't post without name-calling or insults. You prove it time and time again, and why nothing is done about you is beyond me.

I'll bring the post over for inspection:

If that's the best you've got to offer on this thread markvid, why don't you go dress shopping? Not that I'm calling you a cross-dresser, but in your case, it's about as productive and meaningful as the keyboard swipes you're doing here.

There, in big bold letters, just like a first-grader needs to assist him in reading.

Now, how do you draw your take vs. my take on what I said?
 
You proved my point. You cannot post without being insulting or condescending.
Deny it. I dare you.
 
And even if I meant it, if you're afraid of what someone says of you and your lifestyle, which I and most know nothing of, then you really have problems.
 
markvid said:
You proved my point. You cannot post without being insulting or condescending.
Deny it. I dare you.

Deny you're a hypocrite. Deny you don't get drawn into childish remarks.
 
I'm just going to repost this from the pissing matches thread and walk away quietly, wondering who among us will be gone by the end of the weekend. I predict more than one.

Webby said:
I've just now gotten around to reading this thread and will add my thoughts even though it's already been locked up. I'm far too busy to deal with the petty bull**** that goes on here sometimes, so here's the bottom line.

If you are one of the people who argues until a thread is locked, posts on every single thread just to post on every single thread, gets into pissing matches with other people, hurls insult after insult, etc., etc., your name will go on "the list." And I promise you, you do not want your name on this list. Because I have no time to deal nicely with these people and they will simply be flushed. If you don't rock the boat, you will have nothing to worry about.

My advice is to listen to Jones: Don't say anything on here you wouldn't say to someone's face.

Do not PM me about this. Thanks.
 
You're avoiding the issue here.
Can you, or can you not post here without being condescending or insulting?

Yes or no?
If you can't, you need to go,
 
1783.jpg
 
I've got not dog in this fight, but I would like to add...this whole thing is like watching the Titanic careening toward the iceberg.
 
markvid said:
You're avoiding the issue here.
Can you, or can you not post here without being condescending or insulting?

Yes or no?
If you can't, you need to go,

Since when did you become the dictator of issues?

Go read Piotr's post on the similar thread here and for once in your life, go look in the mirror.
 
Who said I am?
My point is, why you don't get, I actually agree with a lot of what you say, but your method of conveying it just absolutely makes you lose all credibility.
 
Yawn, what great insight did you want to add on that thread that the locking did not allow you to get in?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top