Killick
Well-Known Member
Ah, compassionate conservatism.
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070320/NEWS01/303200033
http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070320/NEWS01/303200033
I also toured Building 18, which is the focus of the Washington Post's story. This building, which stood empty for years and is slated for demolition, was put back into use for housing purposes due to the conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan. While I believe that this building is beneath the standard of what is acceptable, I think it is wrong to suggest that mold found behind an air conditioner somehow is an excuse to say that all of our veterans are receiving substandard medical care. It is important to remember that the building in question is an apartment building, not a medical facility. Further the building was scheduled to be torn down within two years.
There is no question that Building 18 should have been upgraded or not in use at all. Postponing Building 18's demolition and allowing its use for living quarters was a poor management decision, and the decision makers should be - and have been -- punished.
three_bags_full said:I'm confused .... nothing new, there.
What did she write that's so outrageous? I mean, where did she say **** the soldiers? She said the conditions in building 18 were bad, right? But not as bad as people have made it out to be. She's probably right.
three_bags_full said:I think her comments were taken out of context. What she meant, I think, is that the reports of the conditions has been exaggerated.
And the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle -- worse than many think, but not as bad as is being reported.