Lady Gaga--hate her or friend her

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber and Kanye West will all receive complimentary tickets on the maiden voyage of the rocket ship to the sun that I'll build one day.
So, I suppose I'm in the "hate her" camp.
 
I hate Lady Gaga with all my might. Just your typical celebrity looking to get the spotlight all to herself.

Like Jerry Seinfeld said, get an act.
 
I don't mind Lady Gaga. She has a couple of good tunes and she does have musical talent. But it does get silly when her goofy fans start comparing her to Madonna and go on and on about how Lady Gaga is a unique artist who has all this success, blah, blah, blah and how she's atop of the Billboard charts.

It's not too hard to be at the top of the Billboard charts when your main competition is Ke$ha, Black Eyed Peas and ___insert random hip hop act___. I mean, there are some very good artists today like Beyonce, Usher and Aguilera.

But a true genius like Madonna in her prime (1983-to-1989) had to go up against a "murderer's row" of top artists that were also hitting singles and albums out of the park: Bruce Springsteen, Prince, The Police, Van Halen, Janet Jackson, Whitney Houston, Phil Collins, John Cougar Mellencamp, Bon Jovi and not to mention the greatest pop artist of all time in Michael Jackson. And Madonna still came out on top once in a while.

Lady Gaga is about on the level of Cyndi Lauper. Good, talented artist with a look all her own. But not in the league of the aforementioned artists.
 
AreaMan said:
I don't mind Lady Gaga. She has a couple of good tunes and she does have musical talent. But it does get silly when her goofy fans start comparing her to Madonna and go on and on about how Lady Gaga is a unique artist who has all this success, blah, blah, blah and how she's atop of the Billboard charts.

It's not too hard to be at the top of the Billboard charts when your main competition is Ke$ha, Black Eyed Peas and ___insert random hip hop act___. I mean, there are some very good artists today like Beyonce, Usher and Aguilera.

But a true genius like Madonna in her prime (1983-to-1989) had to go up against a "murderer's row" of top artists that were also hitting singles and albums out of the park: Bruce Springsteen, Prince, The Police, Van Halen, Janet Jackson, Whitney Houston, Phil Collins, John Cougar Mellencamp, Bon Jovi and not to mention the greatest pop artist of all time in Michael Jackson. And Madonna still came out on top once in a while.

Lady Gaga is about on the level of Cyndi Lauper. Good, talented artist with a look all her own. But not in the league of the aforementioned artists.

Good comparison, although the chart history remains to be written. Lauper hit huge with her debut and followed up with a couple of moderately successful albums -- all spanning the Madonna prime years, coincidentally.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I'm not Gaga's Facebook friend, but the woman is - at least in my eyes - the most exciting pop performer we've seen in quite some time. I like the fact that she cut her teeth on rock 'n' roll and understands what it takes to be a unique performance artist. She also has a sense of humor and is generally pleasing to look at.
 
NoOneLikesUs said:
I'm not Gaga's Facebook friend, but the woman is - at least in my eyes - the most exciting pop performer we've seen in quite some time. I like the fact that she cut her teeth on rock 'n' roll and understands what it takes to be a unique performance artist. She also has a sense of humor and is generally pleasing to look at.

Well, compared to Amy Winehouse maybe. ::) ::)
 
Starman said:
NoOneLikesUs said:
I'm not Gaga's Facebook friend, but the woman is - at least in my eyes - the most exciting pop performer we've seen in quite some time. I like the fact that she cut her teeth on rock 'n' roll and understands what it takes to be a unique performance artist. She also has a sense of humor and is generally pleasing to look at.

Well, compared to Amy Winehouse maybe. ::) ::)

or Heidi Montag.
 
She's merely repeating what others have done before, going against the flow to create publicity and demand for her. Buddy Holly (just watched part of that again), Elvis, the Beatles, Jackson 5, Madonna, New Kids on the Block. You heard the same criticisms about them.
 
She's a billboard for relativism, which is a potent intoxicant in our culture. She successfully preys on a number of cultural touchstones - strippers, alcohol, thoughtless sexuality, guns, latent female anger, skinniness - by placing it under the heading of "being a freak." I have no clue if her ideas or some handler. This week, she's on the Rolling Stone cover wearing pasties and toting a machine gun. That supposed to be ironic, I guess - ripping off the Guns & Ammo girls - but I suspect it's closer to the truth.

Calling her a genius is a little like calling Col. Sanders a genius for the Double Down sandwich.
 
qtlaw said:
She's merely repeating what others have done before, going against the flow to create publicity and demand for her. Buddy Holly (just watched part of that again), Elvis, the Beatles, Jackson 5, Madonna, New Kids on the Block. You heard the same criticisms about them.

New Kids on the Block?
 
Evil ... Thy name is Orville Redenbacher!! said:
qtlaw said:
She's merely repeating what others have done before, going against the flow to create publicity and demand for her. Buddy Holly (just watched part of that again), Elvis, the Beatles, Jackson 5, Madonna, New Kids on the Block. You heard the same criticisms about them.

New Kids on the Block?

Elvis was being himself. He always dressed differently and the hip shaking -- by all accounts -- was just his way of moving to the music.

If Lady Ga Ga is being herself. Great. If she is casting an eye on what sells, then that's where it rubs people the wrong way.

However, I kind of like her. I think she's daring and different and her stuff has a beat. Most pop music these days is crappola, though.
 
Evil ... Thy name is Orville Redenbacher!! said:
qtlaw said:
She's merely repeating what others have done before, going against the flow to create publicity and demand for her. Buddy Holly (just watched part of that again), Elvis, the Beatles, Jackson 5, Madonna, New Kids on the Block. You heard the same criticisms about them.

New Kids on the Block?

Got your attention. I couldn't think of anything in the 90's except what my niece fawned over. Sorry. Nirvana and grunge rock?
 
I don't mind her music. I would have a lot more respect for her if she cut the outfits and weird crap out and just tried to sing without all of the theatrics and bells and whistles. It makes me think that she's insecure and trying to mask the fact that she has no talent. I think she does have talent (she did pretty good holding her own with Elton John at the Grammy's) but she's so over the top that it's hard for me to know who she is.

And the fact that she stands out with what pop music is today isn't saying much.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top