Moderator1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2002
- Messages
- 32,791
What the hell is the undefeated? Doesn't say in the SI story.....espn.com platform? Ghosts of the 07 Patriots?
Where he will hopefully get run over.Also comes at the one-year mark of the SC:6 (or whatever it is called) change. Easy for ESPN to do this by saying they gave it a year and it didn't work out.
The only bad thing about all of this is I'm sure Clay Travis is partying in the streets.
I seem to recall this was the predicted outcome. Hill wouldn't be fired or demoted, just shuffled over to some place where she'll likely remainbecomeirrelevant.
There is literally nothing more tired than Jemele Hill bashing. Holy ****, it's dumb and gross. Something like 99 percent of sports journalists would kill for her career.
We talked here about The Undefeated when it was only a concept (for, like, two years IIRC) ... but how is it in practice? Is there readership or some other metric that can be used to call it a success? It seems totally invisible, but that could be my white privilege talking.
There is literally nothing more tired than Jemele Hill bashing. Holy ****, it's dumb and gross. Something like 99 percent of sports journalists would kill for her career.
We get it. She was nice to you in the press box. Who cares about her social media meltdowns and the repeated need for the company to clean up her mess? Why should anyone notice that?
That's not the greatest argument in the world.
It's safe to say most people would like a "career" that included real estate billionaire, TV star and, oh, President of the United States.
Should we not engage in Donald Trump bashing because his "career" is vastly superior to ours? Better tell Jemele that.
In fairness, we're talking about her demotion right here. So perhaps the term should be "shrinking relevance." She'll never be as big as she was when she had Sarah Sanders calling for her job from the White House Press Room. I like her work well enough, and she is a nice person. But her biggest moments seemed to be when she was stepping in it, not when she was framing the conversation.I was bristling at "irrelevant." If Jemele is irrelevant, then we sure do talk about her an awful lot for no reason.
In fairness, we're talking about her demotion right here. So perhaps the term should be "shrinking relevance." She'll never be as big as she was when she had Sarah Sanders calling for her job from the White House Press Room. I like her work well enough, and she is a nice person. But her biggest moments seemed to be when she was stepping in it, not when she was framing the conversation.