I cannot stand Yoko Ono. Yet she also represents how, when John and Paul each had a similar decision to make, John was smarter.
"Linda, I love you! Come sing backup and help ruin my songs with Wings!"
Not even necessary to reference the alleged Knebworth tape from 1990. Just listen to her on Silly Love Songs.
Now John:
"Yoko, you are a talented person! SO talented, I think you should . .go into that other studio and make your own music! Sure, me and Clapton will play on a couple tunes, but YOUR name will be on thm, because you're SO talented!"
McCartney's ego was the main force behind the breakup of the Beatles, so I think Yoko gets a bad rap there. She contributed, but Paul's complte lack of respect for his bandmates hastened that decline.
That all said, she has been an absolute psycho when it comes to what she calls "John's Legacy." Yoko is very wrong in this case. At least, wrong to threaten to sue. But perhaps not completely wrong . . . .
It would be very interesting to find out the truth behind just what (or who) Lennon Murphy was named after. I've never heard of her until now, so I don't know what the story is behind that.
But here's a bio that reads like an official PR release:
http://www.melodic.net/artistsOne.asp?artistId=7942
"The New York-born Nashville-bred girl named after, yes, John Lennon, headed to Sanford, Florida in mid-2002 to work on what would become Damaged Goods."
Yoko is being an ass. But in thinking Lennon Murphy is using John Lennon's name, she's not completely wrong. In legalese, it can be said that since she is named after the great musician, she is indeed using his name to sell records. Yes, it's her name, but it came from where, again? And she could have recorded under the name "Lennon Murphy" to mark a clear difference.