Getting 'untracked'

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Well, I guess you could just use their name instead of "Podunk commit" but unless said name is LeBron or one equally recognizable, I have been told to make clear who said person is in the hedline, which obviously make my job difficult sometimes.
Just use their current school. Or use recruit? I guess you are referring to a story on a kid committed to the school your paper covers. I said earlier, I'm not 100 percent opposed to it, so I would let it slide in hed if there was no other option.
 
Well, I guess you could just use their name instead of "Podunk commit" but unless said name is LeBron or one equally recognizable, I have been told to make clear who said person is in the hedline, which obviously make my job difficult sometimes.

Not trying to second-guess decisions you've made and heads you've written, but if I were the slot at your paper, "commit" would not be used as a noun to describe an athlete on any shift I worked.

For the one-column headline, how about "recruit"? ... State U. / recruit / undergoes / surgery. I assume there would be other nontextual elements to help readers identify which recruit you're talking about (a mug shot maybe, or a subhead) and the fact he's given a nonbinding promise to attend a university of interest to your readers, provided he does, indeed, graduate from high school and achieves the necessary test scores to be an eligible athlete. And doesn't change his mind between now and the letter-of-intent signing period.
 
AP Stylebook Online came out today with updates:


untracked
Do not use this term for an athlete or team now performing well after a slow period. Use clearer expressions such as back on track. (new entry under sports)
 
AP Stylebook Online came out today with updates:


untracked
Do not use this term for an athlete or team now performing well after a slow period. Use clearer expressions such as back on track. (new entry under sports)

Screw that. I'm gonna go with "unrutted."
 
I consider "commit" as a noun to be quite valid, and quite understandable, and quite reader-friendly, when written about a recruit who ... commits.

In fact, I'm going to make a point of using it more often.
 
I consider "commit" as a noun to be quite valid, and quite understandable, and quite reader-friendly, when written about a recruit who ... commits.

In fact, I'm going to make a point of using it more often.

You're committed to commit commit abuse?
 
I would then be a commit-abuse commit. (Yes, that last word was the subject/noun.)
 
I consider "commit" as a noun to be quite valid, and quite understandable, and quite reader-friendly, when written about a recruit who ... commits.

In fact, I'm going to make a point of using it more often.
Why not "quite" often?! :)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top