Gannett to close Nashville design studio

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

I don't mind the axe over my head. Just means I'll get some unemployment once it falls, then I'm off to the beach for a year.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Holy ****. They already closed the Asbury Park studio and spread that work to the other 4 studios. Now add another studio's work on top of that.

That's about the time they cut the workers at the studios (at least 1 of them) to 35 hours a week for the months of May and June. More work and less hours/pay - truly the Gannett way.

Remember, Gannett has had fairly deep bloodletting at the end of October the last two years. Those things seem to be annual, so there could be another bad scene on the short-term horizon.
 
Holy ****. They already closed the Asbury Park studio and spread that work to the other 4 studios. Now add another studio's work on top of that.

That's about the time they cut the workers at the studios (at least 1 of them) to 35 hours a week for the months of May and June. More work and less hours/pay - truly the Gannett way.

Remember, Gannett has had fairly deep bloodletting at the end of October the last two years. Those things seem to be annual, so there could be another bad scene on the short-term horizon.

Next step is to just get rid of the print product altogether, which I believe will happen by 2019.

What this move means is that every paper from the Tennesseean to the Tallahassee Democrat to the Montgomery Advertiser will look the same, save for probably 2-3 pages which will have all of the local content. Essentially, print subscribers will start getting USA Today with a 4-page local wrap around it.
 
Lots of people I call friends work at that design studio. That sucks.

Got a few friends there, too. One of them recently turned 60, and he and his wife both have had serious health problems in recent years. I hope he at least gets a decent settlement out of all this -- although knowing Gannett, I'm not optimistic.

And then there's this from some corporate bozo in the Tennessean's story. All it's lacking is a quote about how these are "exciting times."

"We are rethinking the way print pages are produced," Stewart said. "Readers will continue to enjoy beautifully designed print editions, while at the same time enjoying our outstanding news coverage on their smartphones, tablets and desktops. We are fully dedicated to providing the best and most engaging content possible — however our readers want to consume it."
 
Last edited:
Got a few friends there, too. One of them recently turned 60, and he and his wife both have had serious health problems in recent years. I hope he at least gets a decent settlement out of all this -- although knowing Gannett, I'm not optimistic.

And then there's this from some corporate bozo in the Tennesseean's story. All it's lacking is a quote about how these are "exciting times."

"We are rethinking the way print pages are produced," Stewart said. "Readers will continue to enjoy beautifully designed print editions, while at the same time enjoying our outstanding news coverage on their smartphones, tablets and desktops. We are fully dedicated to providing the best and most engaging content possible — however our readers want to consume it."

Unless, of course, they are loyal print subscribers and want to read local content in their local print edition.

I know they kept telling us that nobody reads print anymore, but until the day I quit my job I got 1000 times more calls about mistakes/things missing from the print edition than I got about the website. In fact, I think I can count on one hand how many times I got a complaint about a story not being on our website. But I got at least one call (sometimes a half-dozen calls) every day complaining about the print edition. But nobody reads print.
 
Next step is to just get rid of the print product altogether, which I believe will happen by 2019.

What this move means is that every paper from the Tennesseean to the Tallahassee Democrat to the Montgomery Advertiser will look the same, save for probably 2-3 pages which will have all of the local content. Essentially, print subscribers will start getting USA Today with a 4-page local wrap around it.

This has been the long-term plan for a long time. It was being discussed before I left Gannett 9 years ago.
 
I don't know if you guys have seen a lot of the print product recently, but they recently went through some templating changes that make 95 percent of the pages look like complete ****. The section fronts can be semi-decent, but everything else is a cookie-cutter approach, with pancaked stories and jumps stacked up on the inside pages. I've seen lots of 4-column, 2-deck heds, even some 6-column, 2-deck heds, lots of gray and nothing attractive.

Can't fault the Design Studio people, as they have a ****-ton of work to do (and even more now) and it's a matter of survival. They have to do the designs, the story trimming (finishing), wire work, and I think they got loaded on their plate things that the local papers used to do, like weather maps and temperatures and busy work like that.

There have been deadline changes that have gone along with the templating at most of the papers, done solely with the goal of killing print and forcing the sites to be digitally focused. It's a ****ty decision, to give up things like council meetings, late-breaking news, and any sports event that happens after 2 p.m. I'd have more respect if they just killed the print product and completely waved the white flag.

But the ****-sticks still realize most of their revenue comes from print. So they will whittle away, alienate more and more of their customers, then whenever the time comes, throw up their hands and say, "We can't compete."
 
"We are rethinking the way print pages are produced," Stewart said. "Readers will continue to enjoy beautifully designed print editions, while at the same time enjoying our outstanding news coverage on their smartphones, tablets and desktops. We are fully dedicated to providing the best and most engaging content possible — however our readers want to consume it."
Holy ****, what douchebaggery. **** that guy. :mad:
 
I don't know if you guys have seen a lot of the print product recently, but they recently went through some templating changes that make 95 percent of the pages look like complete ****. The section fronts can be semi-decent, but everything else is a cookie-cutter approach, with pancaked stories and jumps stacked up on the inside pages. I've seen lots of 4-column, 2-deck heds, even some 6-column, 2-deck heds, lots of gray and nothing attractive.

Can't fault the Design Studio people, as they have a ****-ton of work to do (and even more now) and it's a matter of survival. They have to do the designs, the story trimming (finishing), wire work, and I think they got loaded on their plate things that the local papers used to do, like weather maps and temperatures and busy work like that.

There have been deadline changes that have gone along with the templating at most of the papers, done solely with the goal of killing print and forcing the sites to be digitally focused. It's a ****ty decision, to give up things like council meetings, late-breaking news, and any sports event that happens after 2 p.m. I'd have more respect if they just killed the print product and completely waved the white flag.

But the ****-sticks still realize most of their revenue comes from print. So they will whittle away, alienate more and more of their customers, then whenever the time comes, throw up their hands and say, "We can't compete."
I've been in that boat. It truly sucks.
The designers still care about the work. Nobody else does at this point.
 
I don't know what the scarier thought is - that's a lot more extra work coming, or maybe it isn't a lot of extra work.
 
I don't know what the scarier thought is - that's a lot more extra work coming, or maybe it isn't a lot of extra work.
The scarier thought is this: Once the owners lay off another round, they treat the remaining workers like ****, even as they dump more work on the workers' shoulders. It's insane. Those who are left should not be abused further. In a better world, they would be thanked profusely each day for coming back to ... you know ... awww, **** it.
 
Next step is to just get rid of the print product altogether, which I believe will happen by 2019.

What this move means is that every paper from the Tennesseean to the Tallahassee Democrat to the Montgomery Advertiser will look the same, save for probably 2-3 pages which will have all of the local content. Essentially, print subscribers will start getting USA Today with a 4-page local wrap around it.
Exactly.
Just what I thought ... again. Just ****ing kill the print product, Gannett. You know, right now we are at the point we're just as a business ripping off the old people who just must get a newspaper. I mean these people are so hooked on routine that they cannot envision life without a morning paper (even with all the delivery problems) and they will continue subscribing until the end. I mean to get rid of this entire plant? 88 people? You said it all. It's going to be a four page local newspaper wrapped around USA Today until they get brave and finally kill the print product. I tell you what. The last folks standing will be the 5-10 newspapers that actually stayed the course and stayed loyal to print and made a modest profit for mom and pop owners. They'll be the last ones standing, continuing to make a good nuff living while letting 95 percent of all newspapers resemble TV stations and radio stations online yet have no advertising to speak of. Listen to Fredrick before it is too late, people. My IQ is so high I've been considered the real Rainman: You suits who want to be TV stations with your videos and radio stations with your podcasts are amateurs compared to real TV stations and radio stations. You are newspapers will brilliant writers. Embrace that before it is too late. LOL LOL LOL. Yeah right.
In concusion ... Newspaper companies should immediately sell the newspaper once they hit the jackpot on the actual newspaper building and the land it is set on. Sell the property, give the CEO his 50 million dollars from the sale of the property, then sell the newspaper. It's the last way to make money for the CEOs: Sell the property. Once you've raked in the profits from the sale of the building, sell the newspaper for pennies. The CEO and his family will thank you as they sail away on their yacht.
 
Last edited:
In concusion ... Newspaper companies should immediately sell the newspaper once they hit the jackpot on the actual newspaper building and the land it is set on.

Say, Freddy, was that a conclusion or a concussion? Please advise ...
 

Latest posts

Back
Top