ESPN Plagiarizes ProFootballTalk

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

HHDougB

New Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
29
Any PFT, in typical wonderful PFT fashion, nails them out for it in a non-deadspin type way. Whadda you all think?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/11/06/well-weve-finally-been-plagiarized/#comments
 
Is it plagiarism when you just transcribe what's on TV? Not defending ESPN, but the original "reporting" was anything but original.
 
I guess that's true. Also, someone on the comments made a good point about it might being an intern who thought it was an AP report and just ran it.
 
ESPN took the entire write-up surrounding the Porter quotes, though.

And they just acknowledged it. Heh.
 
EagleMorph said:
ESPN took the entire write-up surrounding the Porter quotes, though.

And they just acknowledged it. Heh.

ESPN.com's John Clayton is reporting that ESPN.com plagiarized pro football talk...
 
Small Town Guy said:
EagleMorph said:
ESPN took the entire write-up surrounding the Porter quotes, though.

And they just acknowledged it. Heh.

ESPN.com's John Clayton is reporting that ESPN.com plagiarized pro football talk...

According to anonymous team and league sources.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
From the editors of ESPNBoston.com: A Thursday night blog post featuring Joey Porter's comments regarding Patriots quarterback Tom Brady should have been attributed to ProFootballTalk.com. The attribution has been corrected.

Miami Dolphins linebacker Joey Porter says that as he prepares to face the New England Patriots and quarterback Tom Brady on Sunday, he has to prepare for a quarterback who gets protected by a special set of rules -- as ProFootballTalk.com notes.
 
[quote author=ProFootballTalk]We've experienced over the years the phenomenon of news organizations borrowing our stories without attribution.

Typically, what happens is that someone in the journalism business will use one of our stories as a starting point for their own "reporting." So then they'll get someone, either on or off the record, to "confirm" the same thing we've already reported, and then they'll report the item without acknowledging where they first saw it.[/quote]

Wah. Happens all the time. Lead with the plagiarism and skip the self-important whine.
 
It's flagrant on ESPN's part, yes, but PFT is getting territorial over something they wrote off a TV interview. They repackaged it more ethically than someone else.
 
Good thing ESPN.com didn't plagiarize PFT when they reported Roy Williams had a broken collarbone.
 
If I were to say that 95 percent of PFT is simply posting links to other people's stories, and that the other 5 percent was spent throwing **** on the wall to see if it'll stick? Pretty close?
 
JackReacher said:
If I were to say that 95 percent of PFT is simply posting links to other people's stories, and that the other 5 percent was spent throwing **** on the wall to see if it'll stick? Pretty close?

bingo. and he thinks he is the moral thermometer of journalism.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In terms of staying on top of the NFL -- however indirectly -- PFT does a good job, if only in culling together relevant links.
 
When players are talking about a site in the locker room, it's time to throw your hands up and give the devil his due. But you don't have to pretend it's good or that it's honest journalism. It's junk food for NFL junkies.
 
Back
Top