PCLoadLetter said:
wicked said:
Rufino said:
Sometimes coaches have to say no even when a guy really wants to do something - it's called being responsible for the long term.
Good to know I'm not the only one here with this view.
What long term? Dixon's draft position?
So the responsible thing is to give up Dixon's shot at the Heisman and give up the team's shot at its first-ever national championship to protect Dixon's draft status? And he should do that against the wishes of Dixon and his family? Really?
Player does not call the shots.
Neither does the family.
If the coach made the decision solely because Dixon wanted to play, it's foolhardy. Maybe if the backup had been running the first team the past two weeks, he may have been better prepared to enter that game and not lay an egg. Wait, I forgot it's a Leaf we're talking about. He probably would've screwed up, anyway.
I'm also wondering how Vegas feels about the fact that this kid's injury was not reported. Anyone with some insider information could've made a boatload on the game.