I'm old enough to remember what SI was. Dan Jenkins. Dr Z. Ron Fimrite. Kenny Moore. Reilly. Rushin. Just to name a few. Plus, photography that would blow your socks off, and not just in the swimsuit issue. Now?Sad but true: More Americans younger than 25 will not what Sports Illustrated is than not know who SGA is.
Let's not forget Kathy Ireland. :DI'm old enough to remember what SI was. Dan Jenkins. Dr Z. Ron Fimrite. Kenny Moore. Reilly. Rushin. Just to name a few. Plus, potography that would blow your socks off, a dancer not just in the swimsuit issue. Now?
My first year of college, 1990-91, my roommate had the SI Swimsuit calendar, featuring "inspiring" photos each month. Elle MacPherson ... yes!Let's not forget Kathy Ireland. :D
Never read a Harry Potter book, never seen a Marvel movie and haven't watched a Star Wars movie since the original either.Sure, people have never heard of the MVP and best player on a championship team, who is frequently mentioned in every type and form of sports media.
That’s understandable, but you said it “sad” that SI had “sunk into irrelevance,” as if this pick was a symptom of that. If they had picked a famous soccer player, I likely would not have heard of him, but I wouldn’t necessarily see it as a poor reflection on SI.Never read a Harry Potter book, never seen a Marvel movie and haven't watched a Star Wars movie since the original either.
I don't follow the NBA AT ALL. I've vaguely heard of the guy and had no idea who he played for. Why is that so hard for you to accept.
SI has sunk to irrelevance because its "Sportsman of the Year" announcement used to be one of the biggest sports stories of the year. SI used to be one of the most influential media outlets in the country, staffed by the greatest sports writers in the country, with millions of subscribers eagerly awaiting each issue on Thursday or Friday.That’s understandable, but you said it “sad” that SI had “sunk into irrelevance,” as if this pick was a symptom of that. If they had picked a famous soccer player, I likely would not have heard of him, but I wouldn’t necessarily see it as a poor reflection on SI.
That I agree with. It floors me that they squandered every drop of brand currency they accumulated over decades and decades in a matter of 5-10 years. At least they knocked it off with the social media click baiting at some point.SI has sunk to irrelevance because its "Sportsman of the Year" announcement used to be one of the biggest sports stories of the year. SI used to be one of the most influential media outlets in the country, staffed by the greatest sports writers in the country.
Neither is true in 2025.
By that logic, there is literally no winner of the award playing the NBA who wouldn’t be evidence of how SI has sunken into irrelevance.Never read a Harry Potter book, never seen a Marvel movie and haven't watched a Star Wars movie since the original either.
I don't follow the NBA AT ALL. I've vaguely heard of the guy and had no idea who he played for. Why is that so hard for you to accept.
No, the award no longer ranks anywhere close to where it once did, no matter who wins it. SI in no way, shape or form is as influential or important as it was back in the day. It's like winning the Sullivan Award or the Hickock Belt, two other once-prestigious awards nobody even knows or cares about anymore.By that logic, there is literally no winner of the award playing the NBA who wouldn’t be evidence of how SI has sunken into irrelevance.
I think I can name half a dozen active NBA players, but maybe not; is Walt Frazier still playing?Never read a Harry Potter book, never seen a Marvel movie and haven't watched a Star Wars movie since the original either.
I don't follow the NBA AT ALL. I've vaguely heard of the guy and had no idea who he played for. Why is that so hard for you to accept.