Draft Kings

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

SportsCenter now has *daily fantasy* experts, which is interesting. A lot of resources will be given to the hobby like the stated example.
 
The idea that fantasy sports and betting on horses are "games of skill," while betting against the spread or any other form of sports gambling is considered a "game of chance," is one of the dumbest attempts at rationalization there is.

The reality is, all these fantasy sites lobbied for this ****--bought and paid for. And I believe both big daily fantasy companies are partly owned by one or more professional leagues.

What this country, and individual states, consider legal and illegal gambling is so ****ing arbitrary. Oh, I can drop as much cash as I want on lottery tickets, but can't play a hand of blackjack? Both are gambling, but you actually have a chance to win a hand of blackjack.
 
All of which should and does keep him out of the Hall of Fame. My argument is that baseball executives shouldn't be getting in bed with gambling either (and for that matter shouldn't play footsie with Rose every few years by dragging him out for All-Star games, World Series ceremonies, etc.) It's a bad look for everyone.

I can see that, though it doesn't bother me nearly as much as it bothers you and others. But to say that it makes MLB's case against Rose a sham is ridiculous. There is a huge difference between what Rose did and what MLB is doing.
 
So I'm giving Fan Duel a try today. I picked an outfielder for my lineup who happens to be getting a start at second today. Does that matter?
 
If he's in the position group you picked from, he's good. Otherwise, they wouldn't have him listed.
 
I miss the original Wall Street Sports. Now that was addictive.
 
SportsCenter now has *daily fantasy* experts, which is interesting. A lot of resources will be given to the hobby like the stated example.

Thursday, they were analyzing fantasy picks for daily games for PRESEASON NFL games! If I had some extra money, I'd give one of these sites a shot, but it has to be stressful if you ever have a decent amount of money on the line. And people actually play these games for a living. I could not imagine.
 
Its laughable how gambling over the internet is illegal for sporting events, and poker. But perfectly legal for horse racing and one day fantasy. #politics

If you haven't turned on your tv for sports lately, get ready. There are ads and commercials for Draft Kings everywhere. I'm already sick of the guy in the throwback Brady jersey who won a million dollars.

If it makes you feel better, his winnings were deflated by about 40 percent.
 
My lineup tonight in FanDuel:

P Clayton Kershaw $13,400
C John Jaso $2,500
1B Justin Bour $2,300
2B Enrique Hernandez $2,400
3B Derek Dietrich $2,500
SS Juan Segura $2,200
OF Aaron Hicks $3,100
OF Curtis Granderson $3,600
OF Khris Davis $3,000

I badly wanted to get Ryan Braun in there, and still might, once I check in at lunch on some of the recommendations by the experts for the night. For now, I thought $4,100 was too steep and I didn't have a lot of slack elsewhere in the lineup to sacrifice for it. Granderson is a poor man's Braun tonight, looking at the matchups.

I'm really interested in how Hicks does. He destroys LHP, and he's batting in a hitter's paradise.
 
Last edited:
That's not what I asked.

Well, it was what you wanted to know.

Do you really - I mean, really - think that MLB and other leagues are very visible business partners with some fly-by-night operation that doesn't pay out?

My god, the pearl-clutching here.
 
DW, when online poker went belly up, were people getting paid out then?

And have you ever asked Draft Kings for say $500 of what you have made on it, in a check paid to you to cash, and left $100 or so in there to keep playing with?

I'm just curious.
 
DW, when online poker went belly up, were people getting paid out then?

And have you ever asked Draft Kings for say $500 of what you have made on it, in a check paid to you to cash, and left $100 or so in there to keep playing with?

I'm just curious.

I'm sure that they routinely screw people out of the thousands of dollars that people put into it. That would never come out.
 
Not over the long haul you wouldn't.

Would like to see a study showing the results of people who pore over it for an hour vs. those who just throw up a lineup in seconds. I'm not saying random, just quickly pick your guys and be done with it.

If one hour is better than five seconds (or the minimum amount of time it would take to input the players) them two hours would be better than one, three hours better than two, etc. There has to be a spot where there is no extra advantage gained from time spent.
 
Would like to see a study showing the results of people who pore over it for an hour vs. those who just throw up a lineup in seconds. I'm not saying random, just quickly pick your guys and be done with it.

If one hour is better than five seconds (or the minimum amount of time it would take to input the players) them two hours would be better than one, three hours better than two, etc. There has to be a spot where there is no extra advantage gained from time spent.

Of course. That's the law of diminishing returns, and it applies to pretty much any field, not just daily fantasy baseball. It applies to real baseball. It applies to Wall Street. It applies to your 10th grade algebra test.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top