Don't Screw With Keith Olberman

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

D-3 Fan said:
After his 30-day ditty on Cramer, I haven't heard one iota about Cramer on Stewart's show.

Ooooo - Bad timing to make that statement, D-3.

Stewart had a segment on Cramer last week (Cramer wearing a construction outfit with a 'Detour' sign) touting Goldman Sachs up the butt days before the Goldman story broke.

ETA: Here's the clip if interested, just scroll down a bit. It's hilarious.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/shots-fired-jon-stewart-slams-jim-cramers-titanic-advice-again/

It was very funny - because Stewart made the comment, "Wait a minute, the man from the Village People is right" before bringing down the hammer.

Also, one of the NYT's most read stories today is saying Stewart is gaining clout even though he still says he's a comedian, not a journalist.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/arts/television/24stewart.html?src=me&ref=general
 
That Jon Stewart is gaining clout says a whole ot about the left's ability to be taken seriously by serious people, and it says even more about the sad state of journalism, which, at this point, is a word that should be put in quotes at all times.
 
Any of you folks ever hear Tucker Carlson talk about Olbermann on the Bubba the Love Sponge radio/satellite show? I realize it's Tucker Carlson - who is actually refreshingly un-bow-tie-like on that show, but he says Olbermann is like some kind of mean-as-hell dictator around there and has a dysfunctional personal life that overflows into his job. I've always wondered how much of that was true, and things like this don't make me think Carlson is exaggerating.
 
YGBFKM said:
That Jon Stewart is gaining clout says a whole ot about the left's ability to be taken seriously by serious people, and it says even more about the sad state of journalism, which, at this point, is a word that should be put in quotes at all times.

Hey, he's just following the trail blazed by the Limbaughs and Becks of the world. The difference is that Stewart's rantings are accurately labeled as comedy. :)
 
fishhack2009 said:
YGBFKM said:
That Jon Stewart is gaining clout says a whole ot about the left's ability to be taken seriously by serious people, and it says even more about the sad state of journalism, which, at this point, is a word that should be put in quotes at all times.

Hey, he's just following the trail blazed by the Limbaughs and Becks of the world. The difference is that Stewart's rantings are accurately labeled as comedy. :)

No, no, no, he's an influential journalist. Stewart's a funny guy, and he's obviously smart. But he's also a partisan doosh, and if he's the best the left has, well ... I guess that's all right with me. Just wish people would quit taking him so seriously. And I bet Dan LeFevour listens to Rush.
 
Just cause I would like to know, how does this not fall in the "No politics ever" category?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Bodie_Broadus said:
Just cause I would like to know, how does this not fall in the "No politics ever" category?

Stop saying that word, or else!
 
YGBFKM said:
fishhack2009 said:
YGBFKM said:
That Jon Stewart is gaining clout says a whole ot about the left's ability to be taken seriously by serious people, and it says even more about the sad state of journalism, which, at this point, is a word that should be put in quotes at all times.

Hey, he's just following the trail blazed by the Limbaughs and Becks of the world. The difference is that Stewart's rantings are accurately labeled as comedy. :)

No, no, no, he's an influential journalist. Stewart's a funny guy, and he's obviously smart. But he's also a partisan doosh, and if he's the best the left has, well ... I guess that's all right with me. Just wish people would quit taking him so seriously. And I bet Dan LeFevour listens to Rush.

Folks take Stewart seriously, but he's still on the Comedy Channel, which doesn't bill it self as a NEWS channel, nor purport to be some paragon of journalism or broadcasting.
 
Jon Stewart is not a journalist, nor has he ever carried himself as one.

And he doesn't spend all his time banging on FOX. CNN gets hammered a whole hell of a lot, and rightfully so.

Some days watching Sanchez and 'The Lemonator' is funnier than Stewart/Colbert...and the CNN guys are trying to do straight news. That is the sad part.
 
GoochMan said:
Jon Stewart is not a journalist, nor has he ever carried himself as one.

And he doesn't spend all his time banging on FOX. CNN gets hammered a whole hell of a lot, and rightfully so.

Some days watching Sanchez and 'The Lemonator' is funnier than Stewart/Colbert...and the CNN guys are trying to do straight news. That is the sad part.

For my money, Stewart on Don Lemon is still some of the funniest stuff on TV.

His old joke about the Sanchez taser video never gets old, either. I could watch Sanchez getting tased on a loop throughout the day.
 
When I watched CNN during the 'tsunami' coverage, I wanted to go to Atlanta and tase that ******* myself.

Our noble profession was diminished that day.
 
YGBFKM said:
fishhack2009 said:
YGBFKM said:
That Jon Stewart is gaining clout says a whole ot about the left's ability to be taken seriously by serious people, and it says even more about the sad state of journalism, which, at this point, is a word that should be put in quotes at all times.

Hey, he's just following the trail blazed by the Limbaughs and Becks of the world. The difference is that Stewart's rantings are accurately labeled as comedy. :)

No, no, no, he's an influential journalist. Stewart's a funny guy, and he's obviously smart. But he's also a partisan doosh, and if he's the best the left has, well ... I guess that's all right with me. Just wish people would quit taking him so seriously. And I bet Dan LeFevour listens to Rush.

Stewart has obviously struck a nerve somewhere, so of course you wish people would quit taking him seriously. :) Doubt it's going to happen, though.

I don't think Stewart has ever labeled himself as a "journalist" per se ... and I do find it kind of ironic that a show that spoofs the news is a better news program than real news shows.

I'll agree, though ... that IS a sad commentary on the state of journalism.

Stewart still gets mega props in my book for getting away with calling Tucker Carlson a **** on national TV. :)
 
As someone who has worked in TV for 15+ years, I don't understand how Stewart does what he does with regard to the research... and I've never seen anything written about exactly how he puts his show together. It's like a well-guarded trade secret.

By that I mean, how does he find the old clips? How does he monitor 4-5 channels 24/7 ... then turn it around with really great writing for the same day? I'm sure viewers help him out by sending him tips, but that's not enough to pull off what he does.

Awhile back, when Stewart was busting Joe Scarborough, Joe accused him of having "90 writers." Stewart made fun of that by doing a skit in which 90 writers were stuffed into a glass room. The point being, he doesn't have 90 writers.

He must have some mega-talent on his staff, though, and treat his folks very well to have sustained this for so many years.

I mean, the guy has won a Peabody, which is the highest award in broadcast journalism - it's like a Pulitzer - it's almost impossible to win. And the reason he won it is his depth of research.

I don't know what he is-- journalist, comedian, something else... But he definitely serves a purpose-- because he seems to be the only one with a memory... the only person willing to go back and see what was actually said before.
 
When the hell is Donny Deutsch going to comment on this story?

Does he want to remain a guest on Morning Joe so badly that he's afraid to further cross Olbermann?
 
O'Reilly's Peabody: "Uh, oh yeah. It was a Polk. Just as prestigious."

I think that's just a biscuit above Les Nessman's Golden Sow Award.
 
Lee Jackson Beauregard said:
Entourage also won a Peabody.

And allegedly Bill O'Reilly.

Looks like the Peabody's are striving/struggling for relevance. Besides Stewart, Colbert, Southpark, Glee, and Battlestar Galactica have all won Peabody's.

So, tell me again how these are the equivalent of a Pulitzer or that they are limited to broadcast journalism.
 
Ha! I didn't know Battlestar Galactica won a Peabody. There does seem to be some struggle for relevance. ;D It's still a very prestigious award and hard to get because it doesn't have "categories" and there are no set number of awards they give... But point well taken.

The fact remains, though... Daily Show is still pulling off a hell of a trick.

But I get that it's not for everybody.
 
And Lost, The Simpsons, 30 Rock, Project Runway, Scrubs, The Office, Friday Night Lights, Good Eats, House, The Shield, Boston Legal, Dora the Explorer, The Wire, Boomtown, Six Feet Under, Boston Public, The Bernie Mac Show, The West Wing, The Sopranos, Malcolm in the Middle, Ally McBeal, NYPD Blue, The Practice, Homicide: Life on the Street, Ellen, Law & Order, The X-Files, Mad About You, Frasier, ER, MTV Unplugged, and Mystery Science Theater 3000.

I get the feeling that the Peabody's just want to get some famous people in the room at the award ceremony.

Probably helps to sell tickets.

And they really like David Kelley.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top