Crossing the line

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Johnny Dangerously

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
11,408
City & State/Province
Pacific Northwest
Sports director of TV station in Division I-A market wears the local college's colors (with logo) on the field during spring football game and does interviews with coach and former players for the big screens on the scoreboard during breaks.

Not for his station, which I should say did cover the game.

For the crowd, with the approval of the university.

There is a sort of what-up-dog vibe to his vocabulary during these "interviews." The whole thing feels like take-on-Orbitz meets spring football practice.

Is there any part of this that is acceptable?
 
No. But I'm curious as to whether there's a little money in it for him from the school.
 
Johnny Dangerously said:
Don't know, but his station does the coaches shows.

My suggestion is all I got. Otherwise, the sports director is waaay too deep.

I had a chippy high school coach once bark that I was wearing the school his son was opposing at a college football assignment. No logos or such, though. I wear a lot more black now, so I guess no Wake Forest or South Carolina or Vanderbilt for me. ::)
 
Oh, he's way too deep.

Interviewing a certain well known coach of a women's basketball powerhouse after a game, he was wearing a school-distributed T-shirt that said something to the effect of "Beat the (Women's Basketball Powerhouse)."
 
Good grief. The scary part is he's destroying his credibility. Scarier still, he's probably scoring enough points with Hometown U. that it won't matter much.

Sheesh.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Johnny Dangerously said:
Sports director of TV station in Division I-A market wears the local college's colors (with logo) on the field during spring football game and does interviews with coach and former players for the big screens on the scoreboard during breaks.

Not for his station, which I should say did cover the game.

For the crowd, with the approval of the university.

There is a sort of what-up-dog vibe to his vocabulary during these "interviews." The whole thing feels like take-on-Orbitz meets spring football practice.

Is there any part of this that is acceptable?

Did you mean, "What-up-dawg...?"
If so, I get it now. ;)
 
You have to be in SEC country.
In my neck of the woods, the reporters and anchors wear team logo shirts for live shots, refer to the team as "we" and generally act like fanboys gone wild.
I asked one of the reporters about it and he said that he was acting under orders from the station manager and that he wasn't given a choice.
 
JayFarrar said:
You have to be in SEC country.
In my neck of the woods, the reporters and anchors wear team logo shirts for live shots, refer to the team as "we" and generally act like fanboys gone wild.
I asked one of the reporters about it and he said that he was acting under orders from the station manager and that he wasn't given a choice.

Shut up... .TV geeks acting like FANBOYS? I call bull****...

And it isn't limited to the SEC... This thing goes on all over...all the way back to the Federal League

CarrCast.jpg
 
you hear of **** like that all the time in thiis business. I wonder if the person simply has no integrity or just doesn't know any better.
 
Local television is NOT--I repeat, NOT--journalism. It's a bunch of girls who spend more time applying makeup in the news van than actually reporting and guys who look like they crawled out from a sewer sticking a camera in people's faces for inane comments like, "I can't believe this happened in our neighborhood."

As for the local sports guys, they're nothing more than glorified cheerleaders trying to stroke the pleasure nerve of their team's enduring fans. Whenever real news hits, it is always: The (insert your newspaper here) reports..."

None of it is acceptable, but it'll never change. Once we all realize that local TV is a sham, getting on with our jobs becomes much easier. ;D
 
Milo Bloom said:
Local television is NOT--I repeat, NOT--journalism. It's a bunch of girls who spend more time applying makeup in the news van than actually reporting and guys who look like they crawled out from a sewer sticking a camera in people's faces for inane comments like, "I can't believe this happened in our neighborhood."

As for the local sports guys, they're nothing more than glorified cheerleaders trying to stroke the pleasure nerve of their team's enduring fans. Whenever real news hits, it is always: The (insert your newspaper here) reports..."

None of it is acceptable, but it'll never change. Once we all realize that local TV is a sham, getting on with our jobs becomes much easier. ;D
Agreed. The local sports guy here puts a camera on the game at hand, gets the final score and rehashes the games on-air.
Must be nice not ever having to talk to anyone associated with the teams...
 
Where I'm from, the TV guys are all over the message boards, too, pimping their act.
 
jakewriter82 said:
Milo Bloom said:
Local television is NOT--I repeat, NOT--journalism. It's a bunch of girls who spend more time applying makeup in the news van than actually reporting and guys who look like they crawled out from a sewer sticking a camera in people's faces for inane comments like, "I can't believe this happened in our neighborhood."

As for the local sports guys, they're nothing more than glorified cheerleaders trying to stroke the pleasure nerve of their team's enduring fans. Whenever real news hits, it is always: The (insert your newspaper here) reports..."

None of it is acceptable, but it'll never change. Once we all realize that local TV is a sham, getting on with our jobs becomes much easier. ;D
Agreed. The local sports guy here puts a camera on the game at hand, gets the final score and rehashes the games on-air.
Must be nice not ever having to talk to anyone associated with the teams...
Happens all the time--I've seen TV reporters (sports guys) who have covered the Patriots wearing Patriots gear in the locker room. But the worst is the Red Sox--TV talking heads around these parts who are sent to anchor coverage on the road (the 2004 World Series was the best example) are almost always wearing Red Sox caps and jackets on air. More than a few TV people also took time out of their busy schedules to pose with the trophy after the Series was done. Ugh.
 
Guy near me will wear high school colors with logos to high school events ... usually state finals. Otherwise, it's the colors of the big U down the road.

I also feel obligated to mention this. I worked in TV for about nine months. The journalism was painfully bad. But the actual people weren't bad. I have no problem getting a beer with most of them, we just can't talk journalism.
 
Milo Bloom said:
Local television is NOT--I repeat, NOT--journalism. It's a bunch of girls who spend more time applying makeup in the news van than actually reporting and guys who look like they crawled out from a sewer sticking a camera in people's faces for inane comments like, "I can't believe this happened in our neighborhood."

As for the local sports guys, they're nothing more than glorified cheerleaders trying to stroke the pleasure nerve of their team's enduring fans. Whenever real news hits, it is always: The (insert your newspaper here) reports..."

None of it is acceptable, but it'll never change. Once we all realize that local TV is a sham, getting on with our jobs becomes much easier. ;D

I suspect you'll be reading a book Lugnuts' foot wrote. It's called "On The Road to In Your Ass".
 
Back
Top