Cop in Arkansas tasers 10 year old girl.....with mother's permission

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

JR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2002
Messages
31,657
Well, this is hilarious and depressing at the same time. Talk about the shallow end of the gene pool

http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/728622--cop-tasers-girl-for-resisting-bedtime

The girls was having a Defcon 1 temper tantrum over bedtime. Mother calls the cops, dumbass cop can't handle a ten year old so he tasers her, handcuffs her and throws her in the back of the squad car.

And this is the money shot:

The local police chief stood behind Bradshaw and his decision.

"He had no other choice. He had to get the child under control," said Ozark police Chief Jim Noggle.
 
The FBI is investigating? How about Child Services? She lets a cop use a taser on her 10 year old? ****ing disgraceful.
 
I'm so sick of these power tripping cops misusing taser stories. I wish we'd just take their little toys away from them.
 
Stoney said:
I'm so sick of these power tripping cops misusing taser stories. I wish we'd just take their little toys away from them.

I think the more appropriate response is to try a little harder to keep dumbasses out of law enforcement, though the mother's behavior is far more disturbing to me than the cop's.
 
Stoney said:
I'm so sick of these power tripping cops misusing taser stories. I wish we'd just take their little toys away from them.

Well, it was that or shoot her.

/jk ... i think
 
outofplace said:
Stoney said:
I'm so sick of these power tripping cops misusing taser stories. I wish we'd just take their little toys away from them.

I think the more appropriate response is to try a little harder to keep dumbasses out of law enforcement, though the mother's behavior is far more disturbing to me than the cop's.

No police force in history has ever found a way to do that. Same with armies in war zones.

I suspect that that having a position of power has that effect on a small percentage of all people.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
RickStain said:
outofplace said:
Stoney said:
I'm so sick of these power tripping cops misusing taser stories. I wish we'd just take their little toys away from them.

I think the more appropriate response is to try a little harder to keep dumbasses out of law enforcement, though the mother's behavior is far more disturbing to me than the cop's.

No police force in history has ever found a way to do that. Same with armies in war zones.

I suspect that that having a position of power has that effect on a small percentage of all people.

Oh, I know you can't keep all of the dumbasses out. But trying harder to do that seems like a better idea than taking tasers away when they can be useful tools for a police officer who isn't a jackass.
 
I like the last line of the story.

"Medlock said he will attempt to gain sole custody of his daughter."

He'd have to be a complete ****up to not get it, I would think.
 
imjustagirl said:
I like the last line of the story.

"Medlock said he will attempt to gain sole custody of his daughter."

He'd have to be a complete ****up to not get it, I would think.

Having worked with folks who are pursuing custody, the idiocy of judges never ceases to amaze me.
 
Yodel said:
imjustagirl said:
I like the last line of the story.

"Medlock said he will attempt to gain sole custody of his daughter."

He'd have to be a complete ****up to not get it, I would think.

Having worked with folks who are pursuing custody, the idiocy of judges never ceases to amaze me.

Also, we don't know why he didn't have it in the first place. Could be an asinine court ruling or there could be a legitimate reason.
 
Why would the cops even respond to a complain that a 10-year-old was throwing a tantrum? From the report she was balled up on the floor crying. That's illegal?
 
Ace said:
Why would the cops even respond to a complain that a 10-year-old was throwing a tantrum? From the report she was balled up on the floor crying. That's illegal?

No, but kicking a cop in the junk probably is.
 
Ace said:
Why would the cops even respond to a complain that a 10-year-old was throwing a tantrum? From the report she was balled up on the floor crying. That's illegal?

I can't believe a parent would think to do that or that a cop would actually respond. The sad part is that wasn't even close to the most idiotic thing done in this story.
 
Mr. Sluggo said:
Ace said:
Why would the cops even respond to a complain that a 10-year-old was throwing a tantrum? From the report she was balled up on the floor crying. That's illegal?

No, but kicking a cop in the junk probably is.

Putting your hands on a 10-year-old kid who is having a meltdown is a wise move, guaranteed to reassure them and turn around their behavior immediately.
 
Mr. Sluggo said:
Ace said:
Why would the cops even respond to a complain that a 10-year-old was throwing a tantrum? From the report she was balled up on the floor crying. That's illegal?

No, but kicking a cop in the junk probably is.

He didn't respond to a complaint about junk kicking. He responded to a complaint about a 65 lb little girl throwing a temper tantrum over bedtime. This story is just ludicrous.
 
Stoney said:
Mr. Sluggo said:
Ace said:
Why would the cops even respond to a complain that a 10-year-old was throwing a tantrum? From the report she was balled up on the floor crying. That's illegal?

No, but kicking a cop in the junk probably is.

He didn't respond to a complaint about junk kicking. He responded to a complaint about a 65 lb little girl throwing a temper tantrum over bedtime. This story is just ludicrous.

Exactly. And Ace raises a good point. The officer obviously has no idea what he is doing in dealing with children. When a kid is at that point in a tantrum, you do NOT get close without protecting the family jewels.
 
outofplace said:
Stoney said:
Mr. Sluggo said:
Ace said:
Why would the cops even respond to a complain that a 10-year-old was throwing a tantrum? From the report she was balled up on the floor crying. That's illegal?

No, but kicking a cop in the junk probably is.

He didn't respond to a complaint about junk kicking. He responded to a complaint about a 65 lb little girl throwing a temper tantrum over bedtime. This story is just ludicrous.

Exactly. And Ace raises a good point. The officer obviously has no idea what he is doing in dealing with children. When a kid is at that point in a tantrum, you do NOT get close without protecting the family jewels.

Don't they have riot shields for just this type of situation?
 
outofplace said:
Yodel said:
imjustagirl said:
I like the last line of the story.

"Medlock said he will attempt to gain sole custody of his daughter."

He'd have to be a complete ****up to not get it, I would think.

Having worked with folks who are pursuing custody, the idiocy of judges never ceases to amaze me.

Also, we don't know why he didn't have it in the first place. Could be an asinine court ruling or there could be a legitimate reason.

Concede that. I'm just thinking of a particular case when I say that. Custody decisions can be incredibly stupid. But, clearly, I know nothing about this particular case.
 
YGBFKM said:
People in Arkansas are stupid.

You're right. The father should have just taken the kid outside and put a bullet in her head.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top