Convince me.

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

YankeeFan said:
outofplace said:
I've asked repeatedly that people not do that and I have said why. It is dishonest.

Sorry. I disagree. And, you're decision to take your ball and go home as a result is ridiculous.

I'm not taking my ball and going home at all. I'm just not wasting my time giving you some detailed answer for reasons I already stated.
 
doctorquant said:
outofplace said:
You don't like it? To damn bad.

How is one supposed to make his/her way to "damn bad"? Can you point me toward some research?

That's the best you can do? Snide comments about typos? A refuge for somebody who knows he can't handle a discussion on its merits.
 
WriteThinking said:
Wait, you mean us not quoting your entire posts is really what we're being dishonest about?

I've been sitting here for two days trying to figure out, "What in my posts or arguments have I been dishonest about?," ever since you first accused me of it, and I've been coming up empty. It made me wonder what in the world you were seeing/thinking that would make you say that. I'm guessing I'm not the only one. No way would I have thought it was because I didn't quote you're entire post!

We do that -- or, at least I do that -- precisely because I think I get your point, and wanted to answer the part of your post that I thought needed answering, and we don't need to have miles of quotes after a while.

That's really all there is to it. Nobody's trying to be dishonest, and I don't think anybody has been.

Not even you. :D

When you pull out large parts of the point I'm making, and take the response out of its proper context, yes, I do think that is dishonest.
 
spikechiquet said:
Looks like I am not the only one that is being "dishonest". You are a friggin' whiner OOP that makes up stuff to whine about instead of presenting an actual argument.

And I have plenty of facts to back THAT up.

Too bad you don't have the sense to realize the first part of your post is the only thing you have right.
 
spikechiquet said:
3_Octave_Fart said:
A lot of theologians on this thread.
No doubt you've all been to divinity school.
2 semesters of coursework through what is now NCU-Minneapolis (in the early 90s it was North Central Bible College) and almost moved to Liberia after high school to do missions work with a family friend and missionary at our church. Also worked two summers for another of our missionary families and helped with an Arabic-speaking radio show.
Instead, I joined the world of sports journalism. TV first, then radio, now newspaper.
God probably hates me! :D
On the bright side, after a career in journalism, you get credited for time in purgatory, if not hell,
 
outofplace said:
Alma said:
outofplace said:
Alma said:
outofplace said:
WriteThinking said:
outofplace said:
That is because your faith is blinding you to the point I'm making. And that is probably a good thing for you, but it doesn't make you right.

Not blinded to any point you're making. The same thing you're saying of me could be said of you, in reverse. You're discrediting and choosing not to believe things that may, in fact, be true.

As for the relevance of God in somebody's life, there are many who, quite literally, live for him, for whom every move they make is driven/inspired by a desire to please and serve either him and/or other people.

Please don't pull my remarks out of context like this. It's dishonest. This discussion deserves better.

The discussion deserves better, too, than a constant repeat of your blanket "what is truth?" argument. We get it. You doubt the historicity -- their deeds and even their potential existence -- of all the people in the Bible. Fine. Instead of repeating that argument, go read some books on the historicity of those figures and decide for yourself.

You can shove your smug arrogance where the sun does not shine, thank you very much.

I've done my research. You, in your arrogance, just assumed that I had not because you don't like my opinion.

Oh, geez. Then present the research. You're not going to see me in an apologetics argument either way. But littering up the board with the "well, as far <i>you</i> know" canard is just a post-filler. We just don't need page after page of it. Everybody's an adult around here. You have some evidence, fire away.

I'm sorry if, in the past, you've faced off against Christians that want nothing more than to shove their God in your face. We've made a real mess of things the last 20 or so years.

It's simple. You can't handle any historical perspective that questions the reality of your faith. The problem lies with you, not me. You are the one claiming to know something, yet you present no evidence whatsoever. None. just your own arrogance. I'm sorry if you are too blind to see that you are absolutely being an apologist in your attack on me. Your side is allowed to claim it needs no evidence because that is what belief is all about, but anybody that doubts you must prove that Jesus Christ didn't exist? Bull****.

Don't tell me I can't keep questioning things. That is the very subject of this thread. You don't like it? To damn bad.

I'm baffled.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
This thread is turning a bit hostile like I feared it would.

But, it is timely - I lost an aunt unexpectedly on Friday, and parts of the thread are comforting. Thanks.
 
outofplace said:
doctorquant said:
outofplace said:
You don't like it? To damn bad.

How is one supposed to make his/her way to "damn bad"? Can you point me toward some research?

That's the best you can do? Snide comments about typos? A refuge for somebody who knows he can't handle a discussion on its merits.

Chuckling ... you obviously can't handle the best I can do ... or the best Alma can do ... or the best that (insert poster here) can do.

Oh, and just as a by-the-way kind of thing: You use the word "apologist" in a pejorative tone in lots of threads. I think some 'round these parts would find it ironic (I just think it's kind of pitiful) that you've done so on this thread.
 
Nothing will be quite right in OOP World until there's a salary cap in baseball.
 
My friend's husband died Sunday night. He was 42. Has a 3 1/2 year old.

Just awful, awful stuff...
 
doctorquant said:
outofplace said:
doctorquant said:
outofplace said:
You don't like it? To damn bad.

How is one supposed to make his/her way to "damn bad"? Can you point me toward some research?

That's the best you can do? Snide comments about typos? A refuge for somebody who knows he can't handle a discussion on its merits.

Chuckling ... you obviously can't handle the best I can do ... or the best Alma can do ... or the best that (insert poster here) can do.

Oh, and just as a by-the-way kind of thing: You use the word "apologist" in a pejorative tone in lots of threads. I think some 'round these parts would find it ironic (I just think it's kind of pitiful) that you've done so on this thread.

When the term fits, I use it. And I've handled your lame dig and the misleading approach of others just fine. The fact that you are relying on personal digs and lame comments about typos simply backs me up on that.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
My friend's husband died Sunday night. He was 42. Has a 3 1/2 year old.

Just awful, awful stuff...

Damn. Sorry to hear that, Mizzou.
 
outofplace said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
My friend's husband died Sunday night. He was 42. Has a 3 1/2 year old.

Just awful, awful stuff...

Damn. Sorry to hear that, Mizzou.

Thanks... I didn't know him that well, but she's one of the nicest people I've ever met... Her brother was my "little brother" when we played football. They would pair a junior with a freshman and we would show them the ropes... Kind of a cool thing that my school did. I already knew him through his sister, because I was dating her best friend at the time. I stayed friends with her and her brother over the years. Just one of the nicest people you'll ever meet. He'd had health issues when he was younger and they had tried for so long to have a kid and they finally did. It was such a huge thing for them. I'd see the pictures on FB as he was getting skinnier and skinnier and it just ****ed me up to imagine someone having to watch their spouse go through that.

I was on the phone with her brother last night. He was saying that no matter how much she had prepped herself for it, nothing really can ever properly prepare you for something like that.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top