frogscribe
Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2009
- Messages
- 32
Putting this out for the board.
I don't think I did anything wrong - just doing my job.
But, I will let y'all decide.
Situation:
Last year I covered a state-champion softball team that had won 38 straight . This team had not lost a district game since 2006.
This season, with only 3 returning starters from that team, it finally lost a district game. Not only that, but it lost at its new 3-year-old home field for the first time.
In the opening paragraphs, I mention the loss was (team name)s first district loss since 2006 and first-ever loss on its 3-year-old field.
A week later, I am covering the team, and after the game the coach took the girls into right field to give his usual post-game talk. When the talk is finished, I ask the coach (a guy I have always got along with) if he is ready to talk. He says yes, but asks me to keep my recorder off so he can say something to me.
In an uncharacteristic fit (this coach is always Joe Cool) he said I hurt his girls' feelings with my last article (we are a weekly).
Coach: "Why did you need to write that they had not lost a district game since 2006? That is not THAT team. This is a new team. Why do you have to be a drama writer? Does that make you feel big, to hurt these girls' feelings. They feel horrible after writing that article, especially after you reminded everyone that they were the team that got the first loss on our field. Such drama."
Me (in a state of disbelief): "Coach, I just stated those facts to show how strong the program has been. I was just doing my job. You know I support the girls and always have. I can't help it that it was misinterpreted."
He then gave me his usual patient, informative interview. We have talked since and it has not come up. What is strange is that I had a 20-minute conversation with him before that game, and we were in an area where no one was around (which begs the question, why didn't he say anything to me then?). When he was chewing me out his girls could see us. I think he only said anything to me because of what some of the girls said (most are sophs and juniors, and his daughter plays on the team) and he wanted to show them he was backing them up.
I always give a coach on incident before I act on it. I have never had a coach who went to two incidents with me, and honestly, in 15 years there was only one other similar situation.
I say I did my job and handled his bitching quite well.
But I will leave up to y'all.
What does the board think?
I don't think I did anything wrong - just doing my job.
But, I will let y'all decide.
Situation:
Last year I covered a state-champion softball team that had won 38 straight . This team had not lost a district game since 2006.
This season, with only 3 returning starters from that team, it finally lost a district game. Not only that, but it lost at its new 3-year-old home field for the first time.
In the opening paragraphs, I mention the loss was (team name)s first district loss since 2006 and first-ever loss on its 3-year-old field.
A week later, I am covering the team, and after the game the coach took the girls into right field to give his usual post-game talk. When the talk is finished, I ask the coach (a guy I have always got along with) if he is ready to talk. He says yes, but asks me to keep my recorder off so he can say something to me.
In an uncharacteristic fit (this coach is always Joe Cool) he said I hurt his girls' feelings with my last article (we are a weekly).
Coach: "Why did you need to write that they had not lost a district game since 2006? That is not THAT team. This is a new team. Why do you have to be a drama writer? Does that make you feel big, to hurt these girls' feelings. They feel horrible after writing that article, especially after you reminded everyone that they were the team that got the first loss on our field. Such drama."
Me (in a state of disbelief): "Coach, I just stated those facts to show how strong the program has been. I was just doing my job. You know I support the girls and always have. I can't help it that it was misinterpreted."
He then gave me his usual patient, informative interview. We have talked since and it has not come up. What is strange is that I had a 20-minute conversation with him before that game, and we were in an area where no one was around (which begs the question, why didn't he say anything to me then?). When he was chewing me out his girls could see us. I think he only said anything to me because of what some of the girls said (most are sophs and juniors, and his daughter plays on the team) and he wanted to show them he was backing them up.
I always give a coach on incident before I act on it. I have never had a coach who went to two incidents with me, and honestly, in 15 years there was only one other similar situation.
I say I did my job and handled his bitching quite well.
But I will leave up to y'all.
What does the board think?