Mystery Meat II
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2009
- Messages
- 6,806
Starman said:Mystery Meat II said:Starman said:Mystery Meat II said:My thinking: If the show's title includes a character or actor's name, it's hard to call it an ensemble cast.
Right off the top of my head: "The Andy Griffith Show" actually had quite an ensemble cast.
The first couple of years, Andy was on-screen a lot, but even in those early seasons there were episodes that centered on Barney, Aunt Bee or Opie.
Then especially in the middle and later seasons, the writers based entire episodes completely around bit-part people like Howard Sprague or Helen (Andy's sweetie).
"Lucy" would have a couple Desi-centric episodes every year, and in some of the later seasons a few selected episodes focused on Fred and/or Ethel, but 90% of the time it was about Lucy.
When judging how much of an 'ensemble cast' a show has, I don't pay much attention to what cast members do afterward.
My standards are:
-- if a show can develop storylines for characters other than the star;
-- if a show can conceivably have episodes in which the star doesn't even appear; and
-- if new characters join the cast who eventually develop storylines of their own (Or minor/bit-part characters rise to full-time status. Probably the biggest example ever of this would be Fonzie.)
Your standards describe a good, versatile cast. But an ensemble cast shouldn't have an obvious star. The actors around him were all aces, but there's a reason it was called "The Andy Griffith Show" and not "Mayberry".
Well, Alda was the obvious star on MASH and Ron Howard on 'Happy Days.'
Aldo and Howard became the obvious stars, but I don't think the show existed to be a vehicle for them. Even toward the end of MASH's run, when it was obvious that Alda's "this damn war" soapboxing drove the show, it still wasn't Benjamin Franklin "Hawkeye" Pierce and the Seven Surgical Dwarfs. Closer, but not quite yet.