bigpern23 said:
I find the remark offensive and, obviously, the people at CNN.com at least saw it as offensive enough to warrant a blog entry.
I think the thing that keeps this from being a bigger story than it is being portrayed (right now at least, it could still catch some legs), is that it's the kind of political mudslinging we're used to seeing in a presidential campaign and it's directed solely at the one person. Obama.
The Oklahoma rep called gays (which make up what, roughly 10 percent of the population?) a bigger threat than terrorists. Both are bigoted. Both are offensive. And neither have any place in the political discourse of this country. But surely you can see how one is more inflammatory than the other, right?
Oh, I see, so if the rep from Oklahoma referred to, oh I don't know, Barney Frank, as "that Fag congressman from Mass." it would not have been worthy of nearly as big of a stink because she only insulted one homosexual person as opposed to a whole bunch?
All I know is this -- if Trent Lott or Rick Santorum said the only reason Obama is where he is is because he's black -- the pinheads at CNN and MSNBC would have cancelled all programming today and had 24-hour wall-to-wall coverage, complete with cutaways for reaction to every black neighborhood in America.
It is a ridiculous double standard.
But there is no bias in the media.....