M
Mystery_Meat
Guest
Note: I don't know where this should go. It's journalisticy, but it's not a bona fide journalism topic.
Reading the worst lede thread has inspired me (so have three Pepsis and a thing of Starbucks, but I digress) ...
You've heard of the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest, in which the most god-awful fiction writing gets honored? You haven't? Whatever, here's the deal: write a horrible, wretched, abomination-unto-the-Lord lede for a gamer.
Rules are thus:
Judging will be completed whenever the hell I feel like it. First place gets to put "inagural Sportsjournalists.com I Fail at Writing Sweepstakes winner" on his or her resume for when they apply for management jobs.
So get crapping!
Reading the worst lede thread has inspired me (so have three Pepsis and a thing of Starbucks, but I digress) ...
You've heard of the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest, in which the most god-awful fiction writing gets honored? You haven't? Whatever, here's the deal: write a horrible, wretched, abomination-unto-the-Lord lede for a gamer.
Rules are thus:
- 100 words or less. Yes, you can write a horrible lede if you make it so long it needs two flash drives to carry, but that's cheating.
- While horribly written, it should at least be an attempt to make a coherent opening. Sure, you could type I EAT WALRUSES 33 times and call it a day, but where's the challenge in that?
- Keep it within the confines of newspaper taste Making an awkward or inappropriate analogy is one thing. Saying "Route 66 High's schedule is harder than John Wayne Gacy at a Pokemon convention" is quite another thing.
- Plagurizing will not be tolerated. Suck on your own merits.
Judging will be completed whenever the hell I feel like it. First place gets to put "inagural Sportsjournalists.com I Fail at Writing Sweepstakes winner" on his or her resume for when they apply for management jobs.
So get crapping!