What's With The Atlanta Journal Constitution

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Boom_70

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
43,823
GA_AJC.jpg


Today's front page- odd choice to put Bush above fold.
 
No big deal. Bush gets his final AJC sendoff until he croaks.
 
Odd. Here's what Newseum is showing on its site:

http://www.newseum.org/todaysfrontpages/hr.asp?fpVname=GA_AJC&ref_pge=gal&b_pge=1
 
Pete Incaviglia said:
Odd. Here's what Newseum is showing on its site:

http://www.newseum.org/todaysfrontpages/hr.asp?fpVname=GA_AJC&ref_pge=gal&b_pge=1

That's the front page of the special inaugural section.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
2muchcoffeeman said:
GA_AJC.jpg


Main headline below the fold. Somebody's gonna have a conniption.
Like Cynthia Tucker?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ralph Waldo Henderson said:
Well considering they did an entire special section for the inauguration, it's no surprise.

A lot of papers had special section including the New York Times. The Front page above fold is always the keeper for big events. Of the papers that I looked at the AJC is the only one without Obama as it's lead.
 
The inauguration section folded on top of the A section. In effect, the Bush story was the lead of the second section...as it should be.

When you see the paper in the stand, you see the Obamas.
 
Both Denver papers had special sections at the front, then the normal front pages.
 
Boom_70 said:
Ralph Waldo Henderson said:
Well considering they did an entire special section for the inauguration, it's no surprise.

A lot of papers had special section including the New York Times. The Front page above fold is always the keeper for big events. Of the papers that I looked at the AJC is the only one without Obama as it's lead.
I agree. The two papers I saw had Obama as the lead on the front AND the special section cover, with the special section more a keepsake with good photos, quotes, etc., and the 1A front the actual news. Bush was inside. Maybe AJC wanted to give Bush the proper respect, but if it was a Texas paper it'd be more understandable.
 
DirtyDeeds said:
Boom_70 said:
Ralph Waldo Henderson said:
Well considering they did an entire special section for the inauguration, it's no surprise.

A lot of papers had special section including the New York Times. The Front page above fold is always the keeper for big events. Of the papers that I looked at the AJC is the only one without Obama as it's lead.
I agree. The two papers I saw had Obama as the lead on the front AND the special section cover, with the special section more a keepsake with good photos, quotes, etc., and the 1A front the actual news. Bush was inside. Maybe AJC wanted to give Bush the proper respect, but if it was a Texas paper it'd be more understandable.

The AJC's special section had the story, analysis, pictures, personal stories, and the text from Obama's speech.
 
I noticed there were a bunch more Wednesday papers left at local stores and businesses that evening. I imagine the sales were good, but I wonder if newspapers might have been better off not increasing the press run so much and taking about 1,000 extra papers and putting them on Ebay.
Somewhat disappointed to see the local paper put an advertiser's logo on top of the masthead as a presenter of the paper's special inaugural section. (In addition to the same advertiser's ad along the bottom footer.
 
Mark2010 said:
The Obama worship knows no bounds.

Barack Hussein Obama II, the first African-American president in United States history, and perhaps the first non-white to lead a majority white country in the history of man, is somewhat popular in the United States and around the world.

I'm sorry Bush and the future leaders of the GOP- whether they be Sarah Palin or Bobby Jindal or Joe the Plumber or Chuck Norris or an inanimate carbon rod- aren't nearly this popular. Want some McDonald's?
 
Pete Incaviglia said:
Odd. Here's what Newseum is showing on its site:

http://www.newseum.org/todaysfrontpages/hr.asp?fpVname=GA_AJC&ref_pge=gal&b_pge=1

Did anyone see the hed on the Dogs/Gators story on the bottom? Yikes. Get someone proofing the page who knows some grammar.
 
wicked said:
Pete Incaviglia said:
Odd. Here's what Newseum is showing on its site:

http://www.newseum.org/todaysfrontpages/hr.asp?fpVname=GA_AJC&ref_pge=gal&b_pge=1

Did anyone see the hed on the Dogs/Gators story on the bottom? Yikes. Get someone proofing the page who knows some grammar.

Well, you could say the hed was talking about the specific Congressman, hence "Bulldog's" instead of "Bulldogs'."
 
Yeah, I get that, but head still doesn't work for me. A vague tie-in unless you know that the guy's a Georgia grad.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top