Oz
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2004
- Messages
- 21,872
deskslave said:Oz said:Exactly. If Oklahoma State went by another name -- USC, Florida, Ohio State, Michigan, Texas, Oklahoma, etc. -- it would've had the inside track to play LSU for the BCS championship before it took the field Saturday night. As it was, it had to make up ground because it lacked the brand name, not to mention the SEC always getting the benefit of the doubt.
So winning five* consecutive national championships isn't worthy of the benefit of any doubt?
*-Six now, obviously, but less relevant for purposes of that particular point.
Had Alabama lost at LSU, I wouldn't be so opposed to a rematch, but it was in Tuscaloosa less than one month ago. And Oklahoma State has the better resume.
But to answer your question, no, the past five championships have nothing to do with this season. If anything, Florida getting its shot in 2006 and whipping Ohio State served as a reminder that funny things happen when teams get a chance to prove it on the field -- we won't ever know if the Pokes would've cashed in on their chance the same way the Gators did.
Weeden against the LSU secondary. Blackmon against Honey Badger. Oklahoma State's opportunistic defense against the sometimes mistake-prone Jefferson. I would've loved that game. Instead, we'll see two teams who might not throw it more than 8 yards down the field.