RickStain
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2009
- Messages
- 25,530
poindexter said:Really? I'd love read whereRickStain said:I know the difference. This isn't a formal environment, I didn't feel the need to be precise. I'm guessing you are going to try to be condescending because you know that your assertion is based on pretty flimsy evidence and you want to bluster through it.
There isn't any proof of what you are saying. At worst, the jump in home ownership was a symptom of the deeper problem.is a distortion. Lay it on me.Take a look a the United States history books of say, 2002-2007. Have you looked around and seen the foreclosures in this country? Our country is littered with properties that were formerly "owned" by people who did not have wherewithal to own a house. Each of these people were told they can be homeowners by people blowing smoke up their ass.
The distortion is simple: You are trying to blame the larger housing bubble on a relatively much smaller phenomenon: Home ownership among those who couldn't afford to own a home.
Those cases are dwarfed by people who tried to own homes bigger than they could afford, but could have afforded some sort of home.