Washington Times outsources printing

[deskslave]

To the Sun. Axing its entire printing staff.

Just another ray of ****ing sunshine.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/06/AR2008080603537.html

 

[BrianGriffin]

To the Sun. Axing its entire printing staff.

Just another ray of ****ing sunshine.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/06/AR2008080603537.html

In a thread that spoke of the struggles of the New York Times, it was suspected by some that the paper's left-wing slant was the culprit. So I suppose this can be blamed on a right-wing slant...

 

[VJ]

...and the outdated printing press that broke down multiple times each evening.

 

[BrianGriffin]

The printing press broke because it was leaning too far right...;-)

 

[whatwoulddamondo?]

how is this going to work deadline-wise? i'm presuming the times is the one that will get screwed with extremely early press starts.

 

[Dickens Cider]

how is this going to work deadline-wise? i'm presuming the times is the one that will get screwed with extremely early press starts.

You presume wrong.

 

[whatwoulddamondo?]

how is this going to work deadline-wise? i'm presuming the times is the one that will get screwed with extremely early press starts.

You presume wrong.

fine. maybe the sun has the excess press capacity, i don't know, nor do i know about the times' press run times. but doesn't something have to give? it takes time to squeeze in 100,000 papers to presses.

 

[Dickens Cider]

how is this going to work deadline-wise? i'm presuming the times is the one that will get screwed with extremely early press starts.

You presume wrong.

fine. maybe the sun has the excess press capacity, i don't know, nor do i know about the times' press run times. but doesn't something have to give? it takes time to squeeze in 100,000 papers to presses.

I have no idea. What I do know is that the Times' deadlines will improve with this move.