markvid said:Any footage? Dirty play?
markvid said:Any footage? Dirty play?
GB-Hack said:This is just terrible. This, on top of all the other bad luck they've been having with injuries, is the rotten cherry on the moldy cake.
I think they're almost certainly going to have to be exceptional at the back to have a chance at gold. They can do that, they haven't conceded a goal in their last six games, but this is a huge blow.
Twoback said:GB-Hack said:This is just terrible. This, on top of all the other bad luck they've been having with injuries, is the rotten cherry on the moldy cake.
I think they're almost certainly going to have to be exceptional at the back to have a chance at gold. They can do that, they haven't conceded a goal in their last six games, but this is a huge blow.
This wasn't bad luck. Abby was being reckless. I know she was playing hard and that's her way, but once again, this silliness with milestones gets the better of a great player.
There is no way she should have thrown that much of herself at a ball where the possibilities were limited. It was the same as Ribery in the Euros. You have to know when to put all of yourself into a challenge.
Twoback said:This wasn't bad luck. Abby was being reckless. I know she was playing hard and that's her way, but once again, this silliness with milestones gets the better of a great player.
There is no way she should have thrown that much of herself at a ball where the possibilities were limited. It was the same as Ribery in the Euros. You have to know when to put all of yourself into a challenge.
pressmurphy said:Twoback said:This wasn't bad luck. Abby was being reckless. I know she was playing hard and that's her way, but once again, this silliness with milestones gets the better of a great player.
There is no way she should have thrown that much of herself at a ball where the possibilities were limited. It was the same as Ribery in the Euros. You have to know when to put all of yourself into a challenge.
How does this "milestone" thing factor into the equation at all? Her 100th career goal was inevitable, whether it happen last night, next month in Beijing or midway through next season so it's not like she could be accused of being obsessed with a nice round number in the midst of a scoreless tie with a bitter rival. Your argument would only hold water if she was trying for a hat trick late in a 4-0 game or something similar.
As for her level of intensity, Wambach has played the same way since high school with the exception of one brief stretch early in her National Team career that got her left off the team for a very brief period. She comes from a large family of achievers and competitors. Going less than 100 percent is not in her genetic makeup.
I have no actual evidence of this, but I believe it to be an issue of quality and depth as well as setting the premier event.crimsonace said:Unfortunate, because I really liked her as a player and this will not help the U.S., especially in China.
Question for the soccer people ... why is the men's Olympics tournament contested by U23 squads, while the senior national teams play in the women's Olympics? FIFA oversees all international soccer ... that just seems to be a curious distinction. One would think they would want both the men's & women's tournaments to be the same.
Mizzougrad96 said:I want Hope Solo to lead them to the gold to further embarrass the coach from last year's World Cup debacle.
Cadet said:This makes me ill. Watching the game Brazil was clearly playing Wambach at a more physical level than everyone else, trying to keep her from getting the 100th goal. The injury play was not dirty, just aggressive. The referee was not frugal with the cards and warnings, so if a card would have been warranted it would have been given. Wambach knew right away, too. She just looked up and motioned to the sidelines. US didn't look great but didn't look bad. Set pieces were nice, as was ball control, they just couldn't seem to move the ball across the field after Wambach left. Chalupny looked good on defense.