reformedhack
Well-Known Member
Looking at today's front pages on newseum.com, I've noticed that the papers that are affiliated with bigger products — such as USA Today — look absolutely ridiculous not having the Iran missile-strike story on their front pages, instead sticking with an all-local front and choosing to refer to the insert on 11A or section B.
I get the reality that anyone paying attention to the news already knows this happened. But once upon a time, newspapers took seriously their responsibility to document big news and add context. Display on the front page adds the context. Papers have abdicated this important role.
Heck, a paper I used to work for didn't even bother to put the story in the paper. Instead, it did a skytease on 1A to complete coverage in the e-edition. That's a fine plan if the news had happened at midnight. But this was all over the public space by 7 p.m., and I'm guessing the design drones at McClatchy didn't want to rip up the news section to accommodate, you know, actual news.
I get the reality that anyone paying attention to the news already knows this happened. But once upon a time, newspapers took seriously their responsibility to document big news and add context. Display on the front page adds the context. Papers have abdicated this important role.
Heck, a paper I used to work for didn't even bother to put the story in the paper. Instead, it did a skytease on 1A to complete coverage in the e-edition. That's a fine plan if the news had happened at midnight. But this was all over the public space by 7 p.m., and I'm guessing the design drones at McClatchy didn't want to rip up the news section to accommodate, you know, actual news.