A
andyouare?
Guest
Are these just more mushy meaningless words, or does it really mean something?
Does this undercut McCain/Obama, or does this provide the following talking point: "Pull out? We can't pull out, we made an agreement with the Iraqi government."
Bush, Maliki Agree on 'Time Horizon' for U.S. Troop Withdrawals
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/18/AR2008071801308_pf.html
By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
TUCSON, July 18 -- President Bush and Iraq's prime minister have agreed to set a "time horizon" for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq as security conditions in the war-ravaged nation continue to improve, White House officials said here Friday.
The agreement, reached during a video conference Thursday between Bush and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, marks a dramatic shift for the Bush administration, which for years has condemned any talk of timetables for withdrawal.
But Maliki and other Iraqi leaders in recent weeks have begun demanding firm withdrawal deadlines from the United States. Bush said earlier this week that he opposes "arbitrary" timetables but was open to setting an "aspirational goal" for moving U.S. troops to a support role.
. . .White House spokesman Scott Stanzel denied that the agreement with Maliki represents a concession by the Bush administration. Previous discussions of timetables "came from Democrats who wanted to arbitrarily retreat from Iraq," he told reporters in Tucson.
"These are aspirational goals, not arbitrary timetables based on political expediency," Stanzel said.
Does this undercut McCain/Obama, or does this provide the following talking point: "Pull out? We can't pull out, we made an agreement with the Iraqi government."
Bush, Maliki Agree on 'Time Horizon' for U.S. Troop Withdrawals
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/18/AR2008071801308_pf.html
By Dan Eggen
Washington Post Staff Writer
TUCSON, July 18 -- President Bush and Iraq's prime minister have agreed to set a "time horizon" for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq as security conditions in the war-ravaged nation continue to improve, White House officials said here Friday.
The agreement, reached during a video conference Thursday between Bush and Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, marks a dramatic shift for the Bush administration, which for years has condemned any talk of timetables for withdrawal.
But Maliki and other Iraqi leaders in recent weeks have begun demanding firm withdrawal deadlines from the United States. Bush said earlier this week that he opposes "arbitrary" timetables but was open to setting an "aspirational goal" for moving U.S. troops to a support role.
. . .White House spokesman Scott Stanzel denied that the agreement with Maliki represents a concession by the Bush administration. Previous discussions of timetables "came from Democrats who wanted to arbitrarily retreat from Iraq," he told reporters in Tucson.
"These are aspirational goals, not arbitrary timetables based on political expediency," Stanzel said.