Underdogs have their days

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

CentralIllinoisan

Active Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2005
Messages
4,350
City & State/Province
Umm. Central Illinois
Is it just me, or does it seem a lot of underdogs are winning national and/or world titles the last year or so? If my memory serves -- and since hockey doesn't count (Hi, Flash! :D) the last non-underdog champion in any major college or pro sport is the Chicago White Sox.

I likely missing something, but there definitely is a trend.

BCS championship: Florida tops Ohio State
World Series: St. Louis Cardinals beat New York Mets in NLCS and Detroit Tigers in Series.
NBA Finals: Miami Heat over Dallas Mavericks, from highly regarded Western Conference.
Stanley Cup: No. 2 seed Carolina wins it, but had to fight off No. 8 seed Edmonton to do it.
World Cup: Italy knocks off France; Brazil ousted early
NCAA basketball: Florida wins; George Mason is in the Final Four
Super Bowl XL: No. 6 seed Steelers win
BCS championship: Texas upsets USC
 
Well, the Cardinals didn't beat the Mets in the World Series. But I get your point.
 
And of course, Boise State ran the table. Not a national title, but worth at least a mention like George Mason.
 
I know they had a great regular season, but it took the White Sox 88 years to win a World Series. From where I'm sitting, they were underdogs. But I get your overall point, too.
 
Florida was the best team. [SECfanboys, again missing the point entirely]
 
DyePack said:
Florida was the best team. [SECfanboys, again missing the point entirely]

Florida was a 7 1/2 point underdog this morning.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
OK, where's that broken record?

Dye,
Your rants rarely bother me, and I actually enjoy most of your feuds. But give this one a rest. You sound like an idiot at this point.
 
Wow, that's two identical posts on two different threads.

Seems like the previously derided copy and paste is in effect.
 
pallister said:
OK, where's that broken record?

Dye,
Your rants rarely bother me, and I actually enjoy most of your feuds. But give this one a rest. You sound like an idiot at this point.

If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, et cetera....
 
Please. When the number two ranked team beats the number one ranked team, it's not an upset!!! Number two might have been the minority pick, but it's obviously got a chance to win. The SEC champion in any sport has a chance to win its next game, just like the Pac-10, Big-10, etc. champs.
George Mason makes Final Four. Upset. UCLA beats USC. Upset. Texas beats USC. NOT AN UPSET!.
 
Double J said:
pallister said:
OK, where's that broken record?

Dye,
Your rants rarely bother me, and I actually enjoy most of your feuds. But give this one a rest. You sound like an idiot at this point.

If it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, et cetera....
Typical bull**** from Canada [/fudgepack]
 
Michael_ Gee said:
Please. When the number two ranked team beats the number one ranked team, it's not an upset!!! Number two might have been the minority pick, but it's obviously got a chance to win. The SEC champion in any sport has a chance to win its next game, just like the Pac-10, Big-10, etc. champs.
George Mason makes Final Four. Upset. UCLA beats USC. Upset. Texas beats USC. NOT AN UPSET!.

Wow, four exclamation points worth of vigor. But technically, No. 2 beating a No. 1 is an upset. Sorry, mate.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top