I have no idea if what he wrote about what is going on behind the scenes is true, but a few things.
1) He wrote about a 20 percent drop in income, not "cash flow."
2) The use of the word "budgeting" was very odd. A budget is a plan. Nobody puts a plan in place to see their profits drop by 20 percent. That is the kind of thing that happens despite your best efforts to perform better.
3) When you have a company that is seeing its profits decline to that extent, whether it is an activist investor or otherwise, it's not that crazy for the largest shareholder/owner to push for the company to stem the tide. That kind of decline in profits is going to make the company less valuable, which makes your investment worth less. What Alden has done wthin the industry makes it a lightning rod, but at the end of the day, these are businesses that are performing poorly. Alden didn't make people stop buying newspapers. They see a way to earn a relatively quick return on their capital by buying in and aggressively cutting costs. There is probably a reason why newspapers are appealing to investors like that, and not growth investors who see a long-term opportunity with which to be patient.