Deskgrunt50
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2005
- Messages
- 11,269
It was never shutting down for real at this point. It was a stunt to create a villain (despite Biden saying the ban wouldn’t be enforced) and a savior (the criminal in chief).How, though? Just going offline in general? They always said they would.
On the government end, all three branches said screw you TiKTok so not sure how that falls.
Overall, though, I think this whole thing is dicey. It was bull**** how fast and simple it went bipartisianly through the whole freaking government. And now it is sketchy that Trump seems to have his paws all over it and TikTok is like, yay Trump! What are the stipulations? How much is the government going to be involved?
Pure manipulation against a “leader” who is easily manipulated and greedy. He’ll end up getting his cut when a deal is made.
And it’s another indication there won’t law that can’t be ignored and there won’t be any consequences.
The law was passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. Should the law have been passed in the first place? I don’t know and I don’t really care. But it wasn’t really about stealing data, weaponization and propaganda. Because then all social media would need to be banned.
That won’t (and shouldn’t) happen. But the people of this country would be a lot less ****ing stupid if it did happen.
Not only was it a stunt, but a transparent stunt. The only mistake was they didn’t wait to restore service until noon on Monday.