Tiger Withdraws from TPC

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Yeah, it sure is annoying when people take a definitive stance on things. Much less interesting than everyone agreeing that we just don't really know what the future might hold, so it's best not to speculate.

Speculating isn't the issue. It's the (near) complete absence of qualifiers such as "I think . . . " or "It seems . . . " that tends to go overboard.

"I think Jack's record is safe." Reasonable speculation.

Of course, you could argue that in the message board world such qualifiers are understood and a waste of time to write. But it can still be a little jarring to see things always stated in absolute terms, whether it's "Oil is headed to $200 a barrel" or "Tebow will get drafted in the third round."
 
deskslave said:
JC said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
TwoGloves said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
And, Jack is now safe.
So he can't win five majors in the next 10 years? I'd take that bet.

I'd give him a pass for this year. If he hasn't started winning by this time next year I would agree about Nicklaus.
You CAN'T give him a pass for this year. This year is the TIGER rota.... Augusta, Pebble and St. Andrews. An 0-fer this year is absolutely disastrous, with him now 34 with injuries (multiple in the knee, which sounds quite degenerative) and other **** piling up.

Jack is safe.
I love how people speak in such absolute terms. How the **** do you know if Jack is safe? Of course it will be difficult and becomes increasingly more difficult with each year that goes by but to say Jack is definitely safe is ridiculous.

Yeah, it sure is annoying when people take a definitive stance on things. Much less interesting than everyone agreeing that we just don't really know what the future might hold, so it's best not to speculate.
Who is asking for everyone to agree? Who is asking for nobody to speculate?
 
NoOneLikesUs said:
Until he decides to step out from this bull**** façade he's put up, he's going to continue to erode mentally. The physical injuries are only going to make matters worse.
Just like ARod accepted his douchebagitude and thrived this past off season, Tiger needs to accept that he's a just another self center egomaniacal jerk and stud athlete.

Say it Tiger "I'm a pig and I'm OK with that"
 
Sleeping on the couch always messes up my neck too.
 
And if Tiger wins two majors this year, is he all of a sudden once again a lock to break Nicklaus' record?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
BTExpress said:
Yeah, it sure is annoying when people take a definitive stance on things. Much less interesting than everyone agreeing that we just don't really know what the future might hold, so it's best not to speculate.

Speculating isn't the issue. It's the (near) complete absence of qualifiers such as "I think . . . " or "It seems . . . " that tends to go overboard.

"I think Jack's record is safe." Reasonable speculation.

Of course, you could argue that in the message board world such qualifiers are understood and a waste of time to write. But it can still be a little jarring to see things always stated in absolute terms, whether it's "Oil is headed to $200 a barrel" or "Tebow will get drafted in the third round."


It's been easy to note that the prevailing Bronco brain-trust is chrono-moronic, but to draft Timmy T. in the first round was well beyond the pale.
 
Ben_Hecht said:
BTExpress said:
Yeah, it sure is annoying when people take a definitive stance on things. Much less interesting than everyone agreeing that we just don't really know what the future might hold, so it's best not to speculate.

Speculating isn't the issue. It's the (near) complete absence of qualifiers such as "I think . . . " or "It seems . . . " that tends to go overboard.

"I think Jack's record is safe." Reasonable speculation.

Of course, you could argue that in the message board world such qualifiers are understood and a waste of time to write. But it can still be a little jarring to see things always stated in absolute terms, whether it's "Oil is headed to $200 a barrel" or "Tebow will get drafted in the third round."


It's been easy to note that the prevailing Bronco brain-trust is chrono-moronic, but to draft Timmy T. in the first round was well beyond the pale.

That would seem to imply there are actual brains in Dove Valley these days.
 
Tiger needs five majors to break Jack's record. He's 34. Jack won five of his majors at 35 or older. So unless Tiger's back problem is severe and/or chronic, which it could well be, who knows, I think he's still a good bet even if he doesn't win one this year.
 
Football_Bat said:
By the way .... Tim Clark won the tournament.

Edited because it should be life-sized. (OK, I have a dog in the fight, but not only was it about time, but I was also getting sick of Johnny Miller ragging on Tim Clark about his second-place finishes. Worse, the same man turned into Lee Westwood's apologist about not being able to finish off tournaments.)

So, which is it, Johnny? Can't have it both ways ...
 
Can too much sex result in a sprained disk in the neck?

(When the story first moved on the wire, I misread it as "sprained ****" and said "yeah, that figures".)
 
Mark2010 said:
Can too much sex result in a sprained disk in the neck?

(When the story first moved on the wire, I misread it as "sprained ****" and said "yeah, that figures".)

You weren't the only one who was confused:

The Golf Channel reporter who explained why Tiger Woods yesterday pulled out of a major tournament could use some lessons in anatomy.

"[Woods] says he's been playing with a bad neck for about a month and thinks it could be a bulging d- - k," Win McMurry said on-air.

What she meant to say is that the serial-cheater quit in the final round of The Players Championship in Florida because of a bulging disc in his upper back.

The red-faced reporter quickly corrected her X-rated observation

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/reporter_in_tiger_disc_slip_xb9Ed9oBDz7woFUiY0pW9M#ixzz0nX9EXvNI
 
Count me among those who think there is a level of bull**** here.

Is he 100 percent healthy? Probably not, but he's playing like **** coming off a bad scandal and there may have been some in his camp who said he'd be better off playing the injury card as his excuse, especially as he's on the verge of losing his No. 1 ranking.

Of course, they were saying throughout the tournament that he wasn't driving the ball well.
 
Tiger Woods deserves the benefit of the doubt on nothing, nothing, nothing.

Always assume the worst; you'll usually be right, you'll never be disappointed and occasionally you'll be pleasantly surprised.
 
Starman said:
Tiger Woods deserves the benefit of the doubt on nothing, nothing, nothing.

Always assume the worst; you'll usually be right, you'll never be disappointed and occasionally you'll be pleasantly surprised.

Well said...
 
If golf were like any other sport, Tiger would be in serious trouble trying to catch Jack.

But because he plays a sport in which a 57-year-old can be one putt from winning a major and a 58-year-old can finish sixth in a major and a woman can beat 13 male players . . . Nicklaus may be 6 feet under when his record finally falls to Tiger.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top