bigpern23
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
- Messages
- 20,711
Yeah.Youth basketball teams? You mean AAU teams?
Yeah.Youth basketball teams? You mean AAU teams?
Yeah.
OK. What's your point?AAUTeams that need a million dollars to fund usually exist to line the pockets of the people putting them together.
In other words, the charity is for grown men who like basketball
OK. What's your point?
OK. So? What is the stated mission of Cathy's Kids? I don't know because OTL didn't cite anything specifying the charity's mission. The story, as written, questions why the charity hasn't given to cancer-related causes even though it is named after his mother, who died of cancer. But without citing the organization's stated mission, whatever it may be, the story is making a leap not supported by facts.That you wouldn't be able to raise two cents for a charity like that.
When Barnes and Noble asks you if you're a preferred member every ****ing time you buy something and when you say no, they tell you much you would have saved and ask if you want to sign up . Then they ask for your
Email address as if that's normal and you're forced to say you don't want to give it. All this bc you wanted to buy a ****ing magazine.
buying a magazine? Maybe you're making a pop culture reference I'm not getting here.Is that REALLY what you were doing at the bookstore?
buying a magazine? Maybe you're making a pop culture reference I'm not getting here.
PORN, man. PORN!!!buying a magazine? Maybe you're making a pop culture reference I'm not getting here.
I do all my porn on the web, my man.PORN, man. PORN!!!
Sheesh.
How many websites you on?I do all my porn on the web, my man.
right this moment?How many websites you on?
OK. So? What is the stated mission of Cathy's Kids? I don't know because OTL didn't cite anything specifying the charity's mission. The story, as written, questions why the charity hasn't given to cancer-related causes even though it is named after his mother, who died of cancer. But without citing the organization's stated mission, whatever it may be, the story is making a leap not supported by facts.
I never said it wasn't a sham. In fact, I noted that if Jerry DeGregorio is the head of the foundation, it is highly suspect. The article should have quoted or referenced the organization's stated mission to support its claim. It's the reporter's job to give the reader the relevant information, not to make the reader sift through 10 pages of IRS forms to find it.Click on the link, go to the end of the doc under "primary exempt purpose."
http://www.espn.com/pdf/2013/0329/espn_otl_CathysKids2011.pdf
It was a sham.
I never said it wasn't a sham. In fact, I noted that if Jerry DeGregorio is the head of the foundation, it is highly suspect. The article should have quoted or referenced the organization's stated mission to support its claim. It's the reporter's job to give the reader the relevant information, not to make the reader sift through 10 pages of IRS forms to find it.
Do you disagree OTL should have included that in its story?
Did it become the common usage or was it always the intended usage?
Professional sports teams who think they are creating "atmosphere" with their cookie cutter vinyl banners name-checking everyone from the captain to the backup long snapper. "Bob's Buddies" "Rick's Rowdies" "Samuel's Squad". Just don't.
I disagree that sentence was perfectly economical. If it had added something like, "... according to tax documents filed with the IRS," I would agree with you.It did include that information in a perfectly economical way:
"Some specific examples of what "Outside the Lines" found after conducting interviews and examining documents: NBA forward Lamar Odom's charity that promised money for cancer research has not given a dime in grant money to any cancer entity in its eight-year history."