The infamous all-area team

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Breakyoself said:
coaches votes are too political. go with coach nominations and then you pick.
The coaches vote system can save you from upset callers. The first year I picked All-Area teams, I fielded several calls from upset parents about their kid not being on the team. The next year I changed to the coaches vote system and for the past eight years (at three different papers) have been able to tell irate parents, "We don't pick the team. Our area coaches vote on it and we just count the votes." The usual response I get is, "Oh, I didn't know." Many of them sound apologetic. It's great. Yes, it can be political, so I do break ties in the voting, but I don't tell our readers that!
 
i guess that is fine, but i would hope you then call it the coach's all-area team, because it's not yours if coaches are making all the decisions. it certainly gives you an easy out though.

as for suggestions vs. nominations, that is why it is up to me to decide who eventually is on the team, taking into account what the coach says.
 
SE's -- or reporters, for that matter -- that have no balls really make me sick. Just like the guy/gal that is afraid to ask the "tough" questions during post-game.

"Well, we like to have good relationships with our coaches," they say in their defense.

Spineless bastards.

Stick to your guns, Tide. If it comes to it, jet. Although, that would be unfortunate for everyone involved.
 
Frankly, this sounds like more of a management problem than a problem with your all-area team. It's obvious this issue was coming to a head and this happens to be the issue it exploded on.

I don't envy your position. Sounds like your SE is a tool. Quick question: Is your union pretty strong? If so, you need to meet with your union rep ASAP.

Either way though, I think you need to be very strategic about the situation. Line up your arguments, get everything in writing and take your case to the ME. If the ME has any journalistic backbone, he/she will make a move.

I hope you don't leave your job over this. Definitely start looking for a new one, but you shouldn't be the one leaving over this crap. Even if you end up having to pick an undeserving PoY, by complaining to the ME/union, you'll be setting the wheels in motion and things will get better.

Good luck!
 
Both those options are out. There is no union, and the ME canned my column over a parent complaint last month. My reporting and judgement is solid, but those are low on the list of management's priorities. I work at a paper that was printing over five news corrections per week not long ago and corrections of corrections. The concern is not accuracy, but what will keep people complacent enough to keep subscribing.

If the SE doens't go with my selection, then I'm throwing the work to him because I don't want my name on it.

This is why quitting is a deadly serious option right now.
 
I would pick the baseball player as the player of the year, if he is clearly the best player.

This does show a flaw in your system. If only the player of the year gets a feature and a picture, why write about him again?

Can you do a compromise? Pick the baseball kid as player of the year with a short story and picture and maybe do a feature on some other deserving kid/position/well-represented team on the all-area team.

That way you not only do the right thing by the best player, you would give spare your readers another feature on the stud in a six-month period.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Starman said:
Yeah, OK. Cal Caucasian, averaging 7 points, 4 assists, and 3 rebounds, is All-Area, while DeJamma Dunkarama, averaging 25 ppg, 13 rebounds and 8 assists, is honorable mention. Sure.

For some reason, those names almost made me spit up my Fruity Pebbles....
 
I hate to say it then, but you might have to eat it on this one. That's a bad option, because the person who gets hurt here is the baseball kid, who doesn't win an award that he deserves.

I like your suggestion of making your SE write it. If you're to the point where you don't fear losing your job, you might as well make a principled stand on the way out.

I'd try one last thing then:

Get the coaches and parents to stage a pre-emptive strike on your behalf. If the SE realizes he'll get more flack for not picking the baseball kid than by choosing some other kid, maybe he'll relent. Spread the word to the coaches and players you cover that the SE is planning on choosing an undeserving player and have them bombard him with calls and e-mails about how wrong the choice is.

In the meantime, start looking for a new gig because you don't want to be at a paper like this.
 
Well, thing is that this kid won't be the only featured player. I split the teams this year so that we have an 11-man squad and an 8-man squad, which will get its own player of the year. So it's not like the baseball player is getting senseless promotion.
 
Pick Mike Shula as the coach of your all-area team. He needs a job.
 
He said, "I just want to make sure we pick the best player."

He just answered both of your questions right there. He should keep his nose out of it.

I had a stud athlete that was Area Athlete of the Year in basketball (3x), cross country (3x) and track (2x) in a three-year span. She was easily the best athlete in every sport. She led all three teams to top-three state finishes and/or state titles.

I would be more afraid of what my readers might think had I not picked the obvious choice.
 
imjustagirl said:
My old paper's all-area teams were done by ballots from coaches. We just totaled up votes, and that was it.

Now some of the soccer parents at your old paper are griping because there is no All-Area soccer team.
 
When the SE said, "I just want to make sure we pick the best player," he gave you an out to take this kid. You could use those words and argue against the SE to the ME when debating this. You point out that he's the best kid, the SE told you to take the best kid, so there's no argument to be had here.

It sounds like if you ever needed to speak your mind, this would be the time. I'm not saying to get fired, but any frustration about the SE might come out here. Stand up here and see what happens.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top