Texas Police Chief Murdered.

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Boom_70

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
43,823
http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/police-chief-small-texas-town-killed-25099751

" A 24-year-old Texas man has been charged in the shooting death of a small-town police chief, a sheriff's spokeswoman said Sunday.

Joshua Manuel Lopez faces a charge of capital murder of a police officer in the killing of Elmendorf Police Chief Michael Pimentel, said Bexar County Sheriff's Office spokeswoman Rosanne Hughes.

Pimentel was shot in the shoulder and abdomen while making a stop Saturday to serve an active misdemeanor warrant for graffiti. He was flown to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead."
 
Let's see how many protests this generates compared to what happened in Ferguson, Missouri.
 
This is ****ing terrible. Painting it as some sort of equivalent or counterpoint to the Ferguson case is idiotic.
 
SnarkShark said:
This is ****ing terrible. Painting it as some sort of equivalent or counterpoint to the Ferguson case is idiotic.

It illustrates the danger that cops face every day. They don't know if they're going to make it home at the end of their shift. And then everyone wonders why cops seem so trigger-happy in dangerous neighborhoods.
 
Baron Scicluna said:
SnarkShark said:
This is ****ing terrible. Painting it as some sort of equivalent or counterpoint to the Ferguson case is idiotic.

It illustrates the danger that cops face every day. They don't know if they're going to make it home at the end of their shift. And then everyone wonders why cops seem so trigger-happy in dangerous neighborhoods.

Awful that this is; it certainly does not justify trigger-happy policeman, never, ever, unacceptable.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
qtlaw said:
Baron Scicluna said:
SnarkShark said:
This is ****ing terrible. Painting it as some sort of equivalent or counterpoint to the Ferguson case is idiotic.

It illustrates the danger that cops face every day. They don't know if they're going to make it home at the end of their shift. And then everyone wonders why cops seem so trigger-happy in dangerous neighborhoods.

Awful that this is; it certainly does not justify trigger-happy policeman, never, ever, unacceptable.

If the choice is between a dead criminal and a dead cop, I'll take a dead criminal every time.
 
Baron Scicluna said:
qtlaw said:
Baron Scicluna said:
SnarkShark said:
This is ****ing terrible. Painting it as some sort of equivalent or counterpoint to the Ferguson case is idiotic.

It illustrates the danger that cops face every day. They don't know if they're going to make it home at the end of their shift. And then everyone wonders why cops seem so trigger-happy in dangerous neighborhoods.

Awful that this is; it certainly does not justify trigger-happy policeman, never, ever, unacceptable.

If the choice is between a dead criminal and a dead cop, I'll take a dead criminal every time.

That's not the foundation of our society and not even the equation. You don't get to gun down Michael Brown because someone else killed the chief 2000 miles away.
 
One does not justify the other, of course.

But people went into an outrage when an officer shot and killed someone. Now the shoe is on the other foot and an officer has been killed. Shouldn't that justify an equal amount of outrage?
 
qtlaw said:
Baron Scicluna said:
qtlaw said:
Baron Scicluna said:
SnarkShark said:
This is ****ing terrible. Painting it as some sort of equivalent or counterpoint to the Ferguson case is idiotic.

It illustrates the danger that cops face every day. They don't know if they're going to make it home at the end of their shift. And then everyone wonders why cops seem so trigger-happy in dangerous neighborhoods.

Awful that this is; it certainly does not justify trigger-happy policeman, never, ever, unacceptable.

If the choice is between a dead criminal and a dead cop, I'll take a dead criminal every time.

That's not the foundation of our society and not even the equation. You don't get to gun down Michael Brown because someone else killed the chief 2000 miles away.

No, but the bad neighborhoods increase the risk that a cop could get killed. While they are trained, there's still a human element.
 
Mark2010 said:
One does not justify the other, of course.

But people went into an outrage when an officer shot and killed someone. Now the shoe is on the other foot and an officer has been killed. Shouldn't that justify an equal amount of outrage?

It's awful. A cop being killed is a tragedy.

But the danger of the job is part of the equation. Outrage isn't going to be equal for an armed officer being killed in a dangerous job, as it will be for an unarmed teenager who was shot six times in the middle of the street. Being an unarmed teenager isn't supposed to be a dangerous occupation.
 
Mark2010 said:
Let's see how many protests this generates compared to what happened in Ferguson, Missouri.

What is there to protest? The issue in Freguson is that the police shot someone and the officer has not been charged. While I agree the circumstances are different but there is at least something to debate.

In this case the alleged gunman has been charged and is looking at the death penalty.
 
LanceyHoward said:
Mark2010 said:
Let's see how many protests this generates compared to what happened in Ferguson, Missouri.

What is there to protest? The issue in Freguson is that the police shot someone and the officer has not been charged. While I agree the circumstances are different but there is at least something to debate.

In this case the alleged gunman has been charged and is looking at the death penalty.

Protest the culture that enables a criminal like that to shoot a cop.
 
Mark2010 said:
Let's see how many protests this generates compared to what happened in Ferguson, Missouri.

But will The White House send a delegation to the funeral
 
Baron Scicluna said:
If the choice is between a dead criminal and a dead cop, I'll take a dead criminal every time.

1) That's not the choice

2) Cops can be criminals

3) You're dumb for saying that.
 
RickStain said:
Baron Scicluna said:
If the choice is between a dead criminal and a dead cop, I'll take a dead criminal every time.

1) That's not the choice

2) Cops can be criminals

3) You're dumb for saying that.

1. A cop confronts an armed suspect. Who do you want to win?

2. No **** there are corrupt cops. I'm not referring to the corrupt ones.

3. The fact that you see criminals as the equal of cops is even more stupid.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top