Study: Men are clueless regarding women.

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

TrooperBari said:
KYSportsWriter said:
They needed a ****ing study for this? Some people have way too much time on their hands...

Speaking of ****ing studies....

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/08/why_people_have_sex.html

The first comment is un-f-ing-believable:
[/quote]
I can't tell if you are joking or not.

A human being wants sex in order to balance the energy inside of them, or to obtain energy they do not have.

Human beings can be divided into Yin and Yang. All human beings have Yin and Yang inside of them. Women are traditionally thought of as Yin though, while men are thought of as Yang. Yin is soft while Yang is hard.

The reason that a man will usually have sex with a woman, is that the woman puts her Yin energy on the man. This throws the man's internal balance of Yin and Yang energy off. Where before he was balanced, now he has too much Yin. The man does not like that because it makes him feel physically uncomfortable.

In order to get rid of the excess Yin, the man will then perform the physical act of sex with the woman. During sex the man takes his hard penis, hard is Yang, and he rams it into the woman. What the man is doing is pushing his Yang energy into the woman.

That is what the woman wanted all along. Because women are Yin, they, by design, need Yang. The woman puts the extra Yin she has by design on the man who has extra Yang by design and they trade with each other during the act of sex.

It is a survival mechanism. Why would men and women have anything to do with each other otherwise? Men and women could all be homosexuals if it was only physical nerve sensations that were being stimulated. Any physical object can cause nerve stimulation. Why is a member of the opposite sex needed?

But if the woman is designed to need Yang, then she needs to go to the man to get it. If the man is designed to need Yin, then he needs to go to the woman to get it. The energy imbalance in men and women forces them to seek each other out to balance their energies.

The result of course is the continuation of the species as a side effect of the selfish act of trying to obtain energy to balance themselves. The man and woman having sex are really only concerned with getting the energy they need. The child that is conceived as a result is just a byproduct of the act of obtaining energy.

The process also works in reverse. The man can put his Yang energy on the woman, and the woman will desire sex or be willing to accede to sex to rebalance her energy.
------------------------------

I know lots of people want to doubt all of this. The last time I talked about a similar subject, the scientists types went nuts about tests and proof. They say there is no study blah blah.

You know what is so foolish about those kinds of questions? Because I can turn on the TV, wait for awhile, and pull an example right off of the TV of what I am talking about.


But scientists want to insist on studies etc.

Why not take these ideas and consider them? Balance is a scientific principle. This modern world works because of knowledge of electromagnetic energy. I can take an example off of the TV of what I am talking as an example of what I say. The ideas are not that hard to accept of you consider them calmly, and don't allow anyone else to stampede you into what to believe.

Let's all forget our ego's, forget our need to be known as the person who "discovered" this or that, forget our need for fame and money, and just work on science to advance the human race? What do you say? [/quote]
 
T2 said:
I remember, one time in college, conversing with a young lady at the campus radio station. Afterwards, a female friend expressed her amusement at having watched the young lady flirt with me. I had no idea that any flirting had been taking place. I'd missed that completely.

Non-verbal communication is unfair to us oblivious males and should be outlawed.

I'll give you that 'Amen' you're looking for, sir. Wouldn't know flirting if there was a Sprockets-esque announcement -- "Now is the time when we flirt."
 
T2 said:
I remember, one time in college, conversing with a young lady at the campus radio station. Afterwards, a female friend expressed her amusement at having watched the young lady flirt with me. I had no idea that any flirting had been taking place. I'd missed that completely.

Non-verbal communication is unfair to us oblivious males and should be outlawed.

Outing alert: Apparently, this is one of my other handles.
 
Grimace said:
Bull****!

That Hooters waitress was definitely flirting with me and definitely wanted me.

Yeah, so was the stripper.

Seriously, though, I don't see it as men being "clueless" as much as them carrying out a biological imperative. Maybe they don't read the signs right a lot of times, but maybe it's also necessary for the procreation of the species. As in golf, nobody asks how, but rather how many, so the rejections don't mean nearly as much as the successes.
 
I generally interpreted friendliness as friendliness rather than flirtation, unless it was at a bar. I wouldn't have had my first serious girlfriend if my sister, who went to her school, hadn't said, "Chris wants you, you should go for it." A female friend alerted me to a similar situation when I was in my early 30s, but I knew I'd be leaving town as soon as I found a new job, so I couldn't really do anything about it except, without indicating why I was telling her, tell the woman in question what my plans were so she'd get the idea I wasn't a good choice. She's a bright lady and I didn't need to spell it out for her once I told her I didn't like my job and was looking to skip town ASAP.

Of course now that I'm married I treat any possible overtures, rare as they may be, as friendliness. If I think it's more than that, as I did recently when an acquaintance kept touching my forearm as we talked, I say something nice about my wife or ask her about her husband. That usually works.
 
It probably goes without saying, but when has that ever stopped me? I am awful at reading the signs. When a girl smiles at me, I've got no clue. When she sits on my lap, I've got ... and idea. If she touches my arm, I check for lint. If she puts her tongue in my face, I've got an idea. If she says, "I missed you at the party," I think she's just being nice. If she's cradling my boys, I've got an idea.

Subtly doesn't work on this guy, at not with the opposite sex. I get the subtle jokes and meanings. But, for whatever reason, something isn't connected in my brain when it comes to picking up what the women are putting down.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
When you look like me, you just start assuming there is and will never again be non-verbal flirting. Any smile from a woman comes across to me as 'God bless the hideous little tree-stump-looking *******, he's trying.'
 
Bull****!

That Hooters waitress was definitely flirting with me and definitely wanted me.
 
The earth is round.
Steven A. Smith is annoying.
Stephen Curry is good.
Jager makes you stupid.
My editors suck.
Barry Bonds shoots.
John Daly drinks.
Benito Mussolini is still dead.
He's Chevy Chase, and you are not.

Next news flash please:
 
A few months into my relationship with Mrs. OOP, she and I went shopping. I go to the counter in one of the department stores to ask about a watch. I notice that the girl behind the atractive and nice enough, but don't really give her a second thought.

We walk away and five or 10 minutes later, it dawns on me that the future Mrs. is VERY quiet. She's fuming. I ask her why and she tells me that the girl was flirting with me. So, not only is she mad at the girl for flirting with her boyfriend in front of her. She's mad at her boyfriend because some other woman flirted with him. Never mind that I hadn't noticed the flirting at all, nor had I participated.

The ladies keep insisting that they already knew that we were clueless. If that's true, why do y'all act so surprised when we act like it?
 
outofplace said:
The ladies keep insisting that they already knew that we were clueless. If that's true, why do y'all act so surprised when we act like it?


Because they can.
 
Good to see my alma mater in deep study. I coulda been "exhibit A" when I was in school.
 
It isn't the cluelessness that pisses us off. Lord knows, we're used to that. It's those special episodes of sheer idiocy that permeates our relationships like egg-salad farts.
 
Flash said:
It isn't the cluelessness that pisses us off. Lord knows, we're used to that. It's those special episodes of sheer idiocy that permeates our relationships like egg-salad farts.

Funny you should bring that up, Flasher...I'm boiling eggs as we speak...
 
Flash said:
It isn't the cluelessness that pisses us off. Lord knows, we're used to that. It's those special episodes of sheer idiocy that permeates our relationships like egg-salad farts.

Yeah, because we all know women are pillars of common sense.

Like when my wife asks me which dress she should wear then when I pick one she says, "but I think the other one is better."

Then why the **** did you ask me to pick one?
 
Armchair_QB said:
Flash said:
It isn't the cluelessness that pisses us off. Lord knows, we're used to that. It's those special episodes of sheer idiocy that permeates our relationships like egg-salad farts.

Yeah, because we all know women are pillars of common sense.

Like when my wife asks me which dress she should wear then when I pick one she says, "but I think the other one is better."

Then why the **** did you ask me to pick one?

Just to give you your daily reminder that you're a looser.

Don't take it personally, it was a trick question.
 
Armchair_QB said:
dooley_womack1 said:
Because we're clueless, so our pick would be autofail?

But if you already know which one you want, why ask in the first place?

We know we're right but we need the assurance of you proving you're wrong.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top