Stories that are just too HOT to publish

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Carlkolchak

Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2017
Messages
316
If you're in the media business for a long time, it's probable that you have run into or heard a story that left your jaw on the floor. So so so SO mind-blowing that it would shock the world. Usually it involves a major star. Who have major sponsors. And it would just be too damaging to print the story.

Often, the major media are in cahoots with the networks and big sponsors who rely on and work with each other, scratch each other's backs. So the method to handle that world shocker story is to cover it up. Or let the minor media outlets run with it - if they manage to acquire it - and let the story die out, because if the mainstream major media doesn't talk about it, it's probably good ol' fake news.

I can't reveal my whopper of a story because I'm sworn to secrecy. I was only told it by a famous friend from the entertainment industry who was dear, close friends with this specific world renowned super champion. There is zero doubt the story is true because I know and fully trust 100% both sources, the entertainer and the source/associate of the super champion. The story was told to me on the phone and I literally dropped my jaw for an hour. It was beyond unbelievable. Then I followed the story and the way it was spun around and altered for public consumption and became even more certain.

Wonder just how many whopper stories about sports stars never make it to the public, for one reason or another.
 
its-huge.jpg

A story isn't a story unless it sees the light of day. Same way a proposed piece of legislation doesn't mean anything unless it becomes law.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Roy Jones tested positive for steroids after the Richard Hall fight, it came out when Hall shockingly revealed in an interview with a very minor boxing site after the fight that he and Jones both tested positive. Then a major boxing site followed up on it and did an interview with the Indiana State Commission head Jacob Hall who affirmed that yes, Roy Jones tested positive. But the mainstream media never picked up the story, though everyone in boxing was aware of it. Jones was the biggest star in the sport at the time and the powers that be all conspired to ignore the story. This story is an example of how you kill a damaging story about a money making superstar. Freedom of the press? Or media control?
 
About a year and a half ago, an email dropped into my inbox like an anvil falling from the sky. It was from the father of a player at the university I cover, revealing something shocking going on within the program. I was stunned. I showed the email to my editors, and they were just as stunned. But my paper doesn't use anonymous sources, and no one would go on the record about it. The fan base remains oblivious
 
About a year and a half ago, an email dropped into my inbox like an anvil falling from the sky. It was from the father of a player at the university I cover, revealing something shocking going on within the program. I was stunned. I showed the email to my editors, and they were just as stunned. But my paper doesn't use anonymous sources, and no one would go on the record about it. The fan base remains oblivious

No anonymous sources at all? Like, under no circumstances?

That seems silly. If the story is for the overwhelming public good, your paper is doing a disservice to its coverage area.
 
About a year and a half ago, an email dropped into my inbox like an anvil falling from the sky. It was from the father of a player at the university I cover, revealing something shocking going on within the program. I was stunned. I showed the email to my editors, and they were just as stunned. But my paper doesn't use anonymous sources, and no one would go on the record about it. The fan base remains oblivious
What are the basics of the story? Might as well tell it here.
 
Roy Jones tested positive for steroids after the Richard Hall fight, it came out when Hall shockingly revealed in an interview with a very minor boxing site after the fight that he and Jones both tested positive. Then a major boxing site followed up on it and did an interview with the Indiana State Commission head Jacob Hall who affirmed that yes, Roy Jones tested positive. But the mainstream media never picked up the story, though everyone in boxing was aware of it. Jones was the biggest star in the sport at the time and the powers that be all conspired to ignore the story. This story is an example of how you kill a damaging story about a money making superstar. Freedom of the press? Or media control?
Why didn't you report it?
 
Don't feel comfortable with that, at least not right now when I still work for this paper. Maybe I'll tell it as an old war story sometime
Well, it was worth a shot. Too bad nobody will air it out.
 
No anonymous sources at all? Like, under no circumstances?

That seems silly. If the story is for the overwhelming public good, your paper is doing a disservice to its coverage area.

Yeah, I don't agree with it because I can't ever get the scoop on coaching searches, but that's their policy. In this instance, it might not have been for the public good, it just would have been highly embarrassing for everybody. This was also one of those stories that if you run with it, you need to put your lawyers on notice, so I understand in this case why they would prefer the allegations have named sources behind them.
 
Why didn't you report it?
I did at the major boxing site, Boxinginsider.com. But the rest of the big boxing sites and the sports sites ignored it. And the story faded away. Jones ended up making a donation to a kids charity in Indiana but no fines or suspensions.
 
I had a few fans of a small-town high school in our area who had some hearsay evidence that their football coach -- who had just left their school for another job -- took a substantial amount of money to throw a playoff game. What gave their story some credence was the fact that I covered the game in question and there were in fact some very, ah, questionable coaching decisions regarding play-calling and personnel during the course of the game. They were defending state champions, with a 26-game winning streak, and they were shut out in a game they lost by four touchdowns. Ultimately, there was never any hard evidence found -- i.e. no one willing to go on the record -- and the story never saw the light of day.

Looking back on it, I think it was more a case of sour grapes and wishful thinking than anything truly shady. That coach is still in the business and nothing else of the sort has ever been hinted toward him in the years since.
 
I had a few fans of a small-town high school in our area who had some hearsay evidence that their football coach -- who had just left their school for another job -- took a substantial amount of money to throw a playoff game. What gave their story some credence was the fact that I covered the game in question and there were in fact some very, ah, questionable coaching decisions regarding play-calling and personnel during the course of the game. They were defending state champions, with a 26-game winning streak, and they were shut out in a game they lost by four touchdowns. Ultimately, there was never any hard evidence found -- i.e. no one willing to go on the record -- and the story never saw the light of day.

Looking back on it, I think it was more a case of sour grapes and wishful thinking than anything truly shady. That coach is still in the business and nothing else of the sort has ever been hinted toward him in the years since.
Did the coach play at BC?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top