South Park: Why bother?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Joined
Aug 18, 2005
Messages
14,163
Why the **** did they even bother showing tonight's episode?
The censored and bleeped more than half of the God-Damned thing!

They had no problem showing Mohammed a few years ago, but not now. Sweet ****ing Tebow.
 
That was kind of the point, wasn't it? To show the absurdity of it and how annoying and stifling it is?
 
why the [beep] didn't they show the repeat at 11? On my DirecTV it says it's supposed to be the repeat, but I was feed a repeat of Scrottie McBoogerballs.
 
I watched part of it, and it just was not funny. Image or no image, it was not funny.

Even Tom Cruise "packing fudge" just fell short.
 
Moderator1 said:
What does Sweet ****ing Tebow mean? Is that a Southpark thing?

No, it's another phrase on this site that was funny the first time it was used, not so much the 356,989,678th time.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Mizzougrad96 said:
Moderator1 said:
What does Sweet ****ing Tebow mean? Is that a Southpark thing?

No, it's another phrase on this site that was funny the first time it was used, not so much the 356,989,678th time.

that is accurate.
 
One more thing:
The censors will allow South Park to make fun of everyone but Muslims?
They are allowing them special protection no one else recieves. Jesus joke, no problem. Moromons, that's OK. But Muhammed? Whoa, uh wait a minute here.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Moderator1 said:
What does Sweet ****ing Tebow mean? Is that a Southpark thing?

No, it's another phrase on this site that was funny the first time it was used, not so much the 356,989,678th time.

So you're saying it's as funny as South Park.
 
Evil ... Thy name is Orville Redenbacher!! said:
One more thing:
The censors will allow South Park to make fun of everyone but Muslims?
They are allowing them special protection no one else recieves. Jesus joke, no problem. Moromons, that's OK. But Muhammed? Whoa, uh wait a minute here.

If Muslims would stop killing people when they make fun of their prophet this wouldn't be necessary.
 
NY Times confirmed Comedy Central censored the episode without the creators' approval.
 
mustangj17 said:
NY Times confirmed Comedy Central censored the episode without the creators' approval.

That's just a steaming pile of ****ing horse**** right there.
 
Between Comedy Central, and the thread on the journalism board about the writer whose column was totally altered as punishment for not making deadlines, what is with these editors? Would it hurt to, if nothing else, notify your content-makers of these changes?
 
Okay, so I recorded South Park last night at the 11 p.m. (CST) showing and got a repeat.
The on screen guide said it was a new episode.
Are you saying that Comedy Central spiked the show last night because of the backlash fear?
 
JayFarrar said:
Okay, so I recorded South Park last night at the 11 p.m. (CST) showing and got a repeat.
The on screen guide said it was a new episode.
Are you saying that Comedy Central spiked the show last night because of the backlash fear?

Sure sounds like it. A truly gutless move if you ask me.
 
JackReacher said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
Moderator1 said:
What does Sweet ****ing Tebow mean? Is that a Southpark thing?

No, it's another phrase on this site that was funny the first time it was used, not so much the 356,989,678th time.

that is accurate.

This.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The over-censoring of it seemed like a classic Parker/Stone move. Especially the moral at the end.

At least there was still Tom Cruise with Seaman on his back.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top