SJ.com ratings going down?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.
CitizenTino said:
OK, I'm casual poster on here, though I do read stuff a lot. Would never consider myself part of the "in crowd," so feel free to roll your eyes when I ask the following completely behind-the-times question: What is this "other" board, and when was there this supposed mass exodus from this site?

For the record, I'm not planning on going anywhere (whew, aren't you relieved?). I like this site, and I still visit it several times a day. I'm just curious to know what's on the other side of a fence that, until reading this thread, I didn't even know existed.

1) You don't want to be part of the "in crowd."
2) The fact that you don't know about the "other" board and aren't caught up in the stupid drama so many people have created over a message board doesn't get an eye roll. It makes you my hero. You have a life.
3) The "other" board is pretty much a copy of this board, as I understand it, except with a bunch of people who used to complain among themselves about this board, some of the posters and how it is moderated. I'm not sure there was a mass exodus. I know some very active posters on here have nuked or just stopped posting here over the last year or so. You can tell them when you find old posts by them and their user name is black and no longer active. I am not sure what became of some of them. I also have assumed that some of the people who showed up here during that time and within three days on the site knew a lot about other posters (often times bickering with the same people they used to bicker with) and some of the inside jokes, were people who nuked and reinvented themselves with a new name.
 
I tried that one place we don't talk about when this site was down. Not the same.
 
There's obviously disagreement about what constitutes the high point of this board.
I submit that the board's periods of highest activity and membership were not its high point.
The decrease in activity seems like a move toward getting back to that high point.
 
I just wish we didn't have a bunch of assholes around here arguing for the sake of arguing, telling people to go **** themselves and pissing on threads because they are bored.

That kind of behaviour is terrible for this little online community and those people should be ashamed of themselves for ever engaging in those kinds of activities.....
 
zagoshe said:
I just wish we didn't have a bunch of assholes around here arguing for the sake of arguing, telling people to go **** themselves and pissing on threads because they are bored.

That kind of behaviour is terrible for this little online community and those people should be ashamed of themselves for ever engaging in those kinds of activities.....

I **** on your argument. ;D ;D
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
New posts have declined five consecutive months. How does that relate to the assholes who left because of a board that started a year ago?
 
Cousin Oliver said:
Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:
Why are normally otherwise intelligent people taking the time to respond to Cousin Oliver?

See, there you go.

National magazine writers and other truly, talented people have been replaced by coffee machine repairmen and wannabe bloggers. And people wonder why traffic is down?

But, hey, as long as there are less complaints and PMs...

Ouch! I'm not sure why I get under your skin so much.

And I always laugh when you call me a coffee or espresso repair man like I should be ashamed of it.

I've had several careers. Some were more "glamorous" but not were as satisfying, as much fun, or as profitable. I have more security now & am my own boss. it's a pretty good deal.

And I also have to laugh at some of the posters who were the most voracious about how this place should be restricted to sports journalists. It's not like their careers in journalism have been so spectacular.
 
mustangj17 said:
I tried that one place we don't talk about when this site was down. Not the same.

The beer is much colder here. And there's also a lovely selection of cheeses on the members' board.
 
mustangj17 said:
zagoshe said:
I just wish we didn't have a bunch of assholes around here arguing for the sake of arguing, telling people to go **** themselves and pissing on threads because they are bored.

That kind of behaviour is terrible for this little online community and those people should be ashamed of themselves for ever engaging in those kinds of activities.....

I **** on your argument. ;D ;D

****!

Always have to get the last word......

Now on a serious note, I hate typing this next phrase but hell, even a blind squirrell finds an acorn I suppose.....

Ragu is 100 percent correct that certain people, mostly those who left, have a hard time seperating reality from a ****ing message board, which is supposed to be a diversion and where many come just to blow off some steam.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
New posts have declined five consecutive months. How does that relate to the assholes who left because of a board that started a year ago?

Is pure number of posts really the statistic to look at?

Inane, nonsense posts don't add much. How many mashed potato jokes do you want to read?

We always have something like 4 times as many users logged on.
 
Some rather intriguing numbers from the Stats page

April 2007 1474 topics 64,148 posts
Jan 2010 608 topics 29,843 posts
May 2010 432 topics 16,744 posts

I do think the decline in the newspaper industry in general has had a negative impact on the site, although there's still a pretty steady stream on new members every month. Some people have probably left the biz and left the site, although I don't know why you have to be in the biz to find the site useful :D


Mizzougrad96 said:
I'll be on this site as long as it exists. Hell, some of us have been here (or the sportspages site) for over a decade.

The same goes for me here. And I guess as the first member to sign up, I'll be last to leave. Guess maybe I'll get to deliver the BJ Honeycutt Goodbye in Rocks message.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
New posts have declined five consecutive months. How does that relate to the assholes who left because of a board that started a year ago?

There are a lot fewer threads like "so-and-so is getting drunk tonight, come along for the ride!" and other threads where a few posters go back and forth with the same inside-joke stuff or whatnot. Some of those folks left, some didn't.

I think that this place is used a lot more as a check-in-once-a-day-to-see-what's-up other than an all-day chatapalooza. Nothing wrong with that. More businesslike and maybe more lame, but what'cha gonna do?
 
Also no more politics. Cut the thread count, post count and horse**** count considerably. We closed a high-traffic board. Not without reason
 
Not to add more stuff, but this site was a great help to me when I switched from politics to sports. I didn't work in a classic newsroom and spent most of my time on the road for events. The outlet was great for me when waiting for my eds to read my stories on deadline. It helped me learn a lot about covering games (and how much you sports guys, though we politics guys were lazy :)


Now that I have left the biz, I still enjoy coming on here for the latest sports stories. This is as close as I get to an RSS feed.
 
A few months ago, Double Down posted this ...

You know, enough with the pot shots at "Other Sports Journalist Site."

Even if you're one of those who think there are people there who can't let it be, so what? Let it go. There are a lot of good people there I wish were still here, and anyone who thinks we haven't lost something by their departure is kidding themselves.

I was one of the more militant anti-TBD (The SportsDesk is the name of the site) from the time they launched their permanent site, but he was right, and that post hit me like a splash of cold water.

I realized that choosing sides between message boards is, well, kind of sad. I missed a lot of people there, so I decided to put my money where my mouth is and join that site too in the interest of re-visiting friends and to foster the notion that both sites can co-exist.

I've kept an open mind and found "the other site" to be just fine. In fact, there are aspects of it that have exceeded SJ. The existence of politics is one and some threads that were once must-reads here are must-reads there now. Hard truth though it is, there are plenty of people who defected from here who were valuable contributors and they remain valuable contributors there.

But unlike some who have gone over to TBD, I still find this place to be just fine too. Maybe its because I've never had some of the personal issues some over there have had, maybe its because I've always considered the "assholes" to be part of the charm. I enjoy sparring with them. And who's to say that I'm not one of the "assholes" on a given day? Who's to say that any of us haven't been that asshole?

SJ is still superior in many ways too -- the Journalism board is far superior here. So is the Jobs board. So are several other threads intertwined between the various child boards. A personal observation: I think this site hurt itself by having too many child boards. Threads used to come fast and furious when there was just an Anything Goes board. It kept things more lively.

But this isn't about scoreboarding which site is better. Truth be told, they both have plenty to offer and I think they can both co-exist.

Because of that, I've become sort of a ***** when it comes to which site I choose to frequent. Basically, if a thread interests me here, I'm here. If it interests me there, I'm there. There are probably members at both sites who have a problem with that, but I couldn't give two ****s.

Bottom line is that I'm at either site to find things to read that interest me and to interact with friends I've made over my six years here. That's the primary reason I've EVER been here or there. The only provision I've made for separation is that I have a different handle there. The Bubbler handle belongs to SJ and that will never change.

Do both sites have issues? Hell yes. Both are guilty of many of the same things. Outing, for example, has gone on at both sites, but neither site condones it. Since I've joined the other site, which would have been March, I haven't seen any instance of outing at all and I have access to the full site there. The notion that exists here that there is rampant outing over there is patently false.

Each site, in my opinion, does have distinct issues that are all their own. Here, its what most call trolling. I don't consider it trolling from most of the guilty parties so much as agenda-driven posting whether the thread has anything to do with an agenda or not. That's a problem here that many get away with.

Over there, it's the navel-gazing about this site. I will say this, it's nice to have a conduit to talk about SJ-related issues, because many perceived uncomfortable discussions about SJ (and TBD) have been spiked here, which I think is really unfortunate. I think the idea that you can't always speak freely about this site here has driven some people over there because they feel they don't have a voice. I totally sympathize with that.

On the other hand, the are several posters there who just can't help themselves but to take potshots at folks who remain here. It's totally petty and pointless. Why waste time getting angry about people you chose not to be with anymore? It's akin to complaining about an ex long past time the relationship is over.

What is the point of all of this? I really don't know, I just had to get it off my chest, but I do think if there's enough people at both sites willing to offer up the olive branch, it would do both sites a lot of good.

I encourage those here to give TSD a try before they criticize it. By the same token, the olive branch has to go both ways, and I encourage those who left to come back and give SJ another chance. I'm going to copy-and-paste this post there too.

Both sites will be richer for it, which is what we all want, right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top